Sustainability / GovernanceCorporate Governance
- Basic Approach
- History of Strengthening Corporate Governance
- Corporate Governance Framework
- Effectiveness Evaluation of the Board of Directors
- Internal Audit
- Appointment and Compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
- Policy Regarding Cross-Holding of Shares
- Communication with Shareholders and Investors
Basic Approach
Based on our Basic Philosophy of being a “company making lives better by co-creating value,” we see the reinforcement of corporate governance as a key management priority for improving corporate value and thereby contributing to the interests of our various stakeholders. Along with maintaining an efficient and dynamic organizational structure that enables us to quickly respond to changes in our business environment, we strive to preserve and reinforce the already highly effective corporate governance structure through which we consistently improve our corporate value by ensuring managerial transparency and legal compliance.
History of Strengthening Corporate Governance
Scroll left or right
| Date | Initiative | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| June 1999 | Introduced the Executive Officer System | To separate supervisory and business execution functions clearly |
| June 2000 | Appointed Outside Directors | To strengthen decision-making and supervisory functions and ensure transparency in management |
| Established the Nomination and Compensation Committee | To improve objectivity and transparency in the nomination and compensation assessment process | |
| June 2003 | Shortened the term of office for Directors from two years to one | To clarify management responsibilities of Directors to shareholders and build a system that responds quickly to changes |
| March 2006 | Established the Information Disclosure Committee | To ensure the reliability of the information to be disclosed |
| April 2006 | Established the Risk Management Committee | To accurately understand and appropriately manage risks |
| May 2006 | Established the Basic Policy on Building an Internal Control System | To develop an internal control structure |
| August 2010 | Established the Internal Control Council | To build an internal control system and ensure the adequateness of its operation |
| January 2016 | Started to evaluate the effectiveness of the Board of Directors | To maintain and improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors |
| June 2017 | Increased the ratio of Outside Directors to 50% | To ensure further transparency of decision-making and supervisory functions and management |
| January 2020 | Improved the method for evaluating the effectiveness of the Board of Directors | To introduce individual interviews in addition to surveys |
| June 2022 | Increased the ratio of Outside Directors to 60% | To ensure further transparency of decision-making and supervisory functions and management |
| January 2023 | Changed the method for evaluating the effectiveness of the Board of Directors | To use external experts as part of the evaluation process |
*The Basic Policy for Structuring the Internal Control System, established in March 2006, is revised as necessary, such as when organizational changes occur.
Corporate Governance Framework
Outline of the Corporate Governance Framework (as of end of June 2025)
Electing multiple Outside Directors is a basic policy of the Daicel Group. By electing Outside Directors, who now comprise a majority of the Board of Directors, and considering their opinions and advice as informed by their diverse expertise, Daicel is working to bolster the oversight functions and appropriateness of management decisions made by the Board of Directors. Moreover, our Executive Officer system has enabled us to clearly separate our decision-making/supervisory functions from our business execution functions, allowing for a dynamic business execution structure that allows us to quickly respond to changes in the management environment.
Through this governance structure, we strive to consistently improve corporate value with all reasonable considerations made for our stakeholders.
Scroll left or right
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Type of organizational structure | Company with Audit & Supervisory Board |
| Chairperson of Board of Directors | Chairperson of the Board |
| Number of Directors | 11 (including 2 female Directors) |
| Number of Outside Directors | 6 (all 6 are independent Directors) |
| Number of Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 4 (including 1 female Audit & Supervisory Board Member) |
| Number of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 3 (all 3 are independent Audit & Supervisory Board Members) |
| Number of Executive Officers | 17 (including 4 officers concurrently serving as Directors) |
| Number of Board of Director meetings held in FY2024/3 (average attendance rate of outside Directors/outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members) |
16 (100%/100%) |
| Number of Audit & Supervisory Board meetings held in FY2024/3 (average attendance rate of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members) |
15 (100%) |
| Term of office for Directors | 1 year |
| Term of office for Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 4 years |
| Average term in office for Directors | 4.3 years |
| Average term in office for Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 3.6 years |
| Voluntary advisory body to the Board of Directors | Nomination and Compensation Committee is composed of 9 Directors (including 6 Outside Directors) and chaired by an Outside Director. Meetings held in FY2025/3: 10 |
| Compensation system for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members* |
|
| External Auditor | Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC |
*The compensation system is also used for executive officers and others.
The ratio of (1), (2), and (3) above is generally 55:30:15, with the ratio changing based on the individual’s position.
Corporate Governance Framework (as of the end of June 2025)
Board of Directors
The Company recognizes the role of the Board of Directors as following: setting the direction we should aim for, creating a concrete business strategy toward the target, and supervising the execution of business and business operations from an objective point of view. The Board is made up of five Inside Directors and six Outside Directors (nine men and two women) to ensure the effectiveness of this role. Inside Directors have profound insights into our businesses, while Outside Directors have a wealth of experience in business management and diverse expertise. All Outside Directors are independent. Details about them are indicated under “Information about Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members” in the Securities Report. The Outside Directors satisfy the “Standards for Independence of Outside Directors/Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members” as defined by the Company. Therefore, we organize the Board of Directors in a way that allows the Outside Directors, who are in a majority on the Board of Directors, to state their opinions to the Company’s management from the objective and independent Directors’ point of view.
The Board of Directors is, in principle, held once a month to make decisions on important management matters and to supervise the execution of duties and business operations. In addition to the Directors, all four Audit & Supervisory Board Members, including three Outside Members, attend the meetings and provide opinions as necessary.
The position of Chairperson of the Board of Directors is held by the Chairperson of the Board.
The term of office for Daicel’s Directors is one year. This short term of office enables Daicel shareholders to increase their involvement in the appointment of Directors. At the same time, it allows the Company to better clarify the management responsibilities of its Directors and thereby strengthen its corporate governance.
It is necessary for each Director to develop his/her knowledge of our business to ensure effective supervision of the execution of business. Therefore, we provide opportunities for mainly Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members to tour our manufacturing sites and provide an explanation of Daicel’s departments, products and technologies as well as the Board of Directors’ meetings.
The activities of the Board of Directors are as follows.
Number of Board of Directors meetings in FY2025/3: 16
Number of resolutions, discussions, and reports at Board of Directors meeting was as follows.
| Resolution Report Category | Number |
|---|---|
| IR | 6 |
| Governance, Internal Control | 24 |
| Compliance, Corporate Ethics | 8 |
| Sustainability | 2 |
| Audit & Supervisory Board Members, External Auditors | 3 |
| Management Strategies | 14 |
| Accounting, Finance | 45 |
| Individual Cases | 12 |
| HR, Remuneration | 37 |
| Internal Audits | 2 |
| Total | 153 |
FY2025/3 Board of Directors Summary of Major Resolutions, Discussions, and Reports Related to Governance and Compliance
Scroll left or right
| Date | Agenda Category | Agenda | Summary of Resolutions, Discussions, and Reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| April 26, 2024 | Governance, Internal Control | Director and Audit & Supervisory Board Member training track record | Information provision and status of training for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members |
| Effectiveness evaluation of the Board of Directors | Reporting and discussion of the results of the effectiveness evaluation of the Board of Directors | ||
| June 6, 2024 | Report on promotion of women’s advancement | Monitoring the status of initiatives to promote women's advancement | |
| June 21, 2024 | Corporate Governance Code | Status of response to the Corporate Governance Code | |
| July 4, 2024 | Cross-shareholdings | Consideration of the holding status of Daicel’s cross-held shares | |
| February 20, 2025 | Organizational changes | Establishment of a new department related to group governance | |
| March 27, 2025 | Regulation establishment | Establishment of the Safety, Quality, and Risk Management Regulations | |
| April 26, 2024 | Compliance and corporate ethics | “Safety, Quality and Compliance” | Reports on initiatives related to quality compliance, and reports on safety, quality, and compliance matters at Japanese and overseas locations |
| July 4, 2024 | |||
| August 2, 2024 | |||
| September 19, 2024 | |||
| August 2, 2024 | Status of Group whistleblower system | Reporting on the content and response status of internal whistleblowing within the Group | |
| November 7, 2024 | |||
| February 5, 2025 | |||
| February 20, 2025 | Response to safety and quality risk | Review of various regulations to strengthen risk response capabilities regarding safety and quality | |
| May 9, 2024 | Audit & Supervisory Board Members / External Auditors | Audit by Audit & Supervisory Board Members | Reporting on resolutions of the Audit & Supervisory Board, audit plans, audit reports, etc. |
| June 21, 2024 | |||
| July 4, 2024 | |||
| April 26, 2024 | Internal audits | Internal audits plans | FY2025/3 Internal audits plans |
| June 21, 2024 | Internal control over financial reporting | Reporting and discussion of internal control reports related to financial reporting |
Audit & Supervisory Board
The Audit & Supervisory Board comprises four members (three men and one woman), and a majority of three members are independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members that meet the standards for independence of Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members. Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members possess extensive experience in accounting, legal affairs, and other disciplines, as well as broad insight into fields such as CSR, corporate governance, and business ethics, and fulfill auditing functions from a third-party, independent standpoint.
The Audit & Supervisory Board holds meetings to share information, deliberate on, and make decisions about important issues related to the Company’s audits. It also regularly attends Board of Directors meetings and important internal meetings held by Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Members, and regularly meets with the Representative Director, Outside Directors, and External Auditors. In addition, it works to improve auditing effectiveness through such means as communicating with the Internal Audit Department’s Auditing Division when needed.
The activities of the Audit & Supervisory Board Members are as follows.
Scroll left or right
| Category | Activity | Relevance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full-time | Outside | ||
| (1) Director | Attendance at Board of Directors meetings | ○ | ○ |
| Regular meetings with the Representative Director (exchange of opinions, etc.: held semiannually) | ○ | ○ | |
| Regular meetings with Outside Directors (exchange of opinions, etc.: held semiannually) | ○ | ○ | |
| (2) Job execution | Interviews and hearings with the President and CEO, Senior Managing Executive Officer, and Managing Executive Officers (implemented for 9 of 9 planned people) | ○ | - |
| Attendance at important meetings, such as Management Meetings, Planning Meetings, Management Strategy Meetings and the Internal Control Council | ○ | - | |
| Perusal and confirmation of important documents (Board of Directors meetings minutes, approval requests, approval documents, etc.) | ○ | ● | |
| Audits of each Company department (implemented for 20 of 20 planned departments) | ○ | ● | |
| Visits to each business site (implemented for 7 of 7 planned sites) | ○ | ● | |
| (3) Subsidiaries | Visits to domestic and overseas Group companies (planned for 29 companies, and implemented for 27 companies) | ○ | ● |
| Regular meetings with Audit & Supervisory Board members of Group companies (reports on the status of each company's audits, exchanges of opinions, etc.: held annually) | ○ | ● | |
| (4) Internal audits | Regular meetings with the Internal Audit Department (explanation of the plan, report on the implementation status, exchange of opinions, etc.)
|
○ | ○ |
| (5) Accounting audits | Regular meetings with the External Auditor (explanation of audit plan, mid-term review reports, audit results reports) | ○ | ○ |
| Meetings with the External Auditor (in addition to the above, status report on non-assurance services, exchanges of opinions, consultations, etc.: held as necessary) | ○ | - | |
| External Auditor evaluation (held annually) | ○ | ○ | |
*Relevance [ ○: Responsible ●: Optional / Partially responsible ]
With respect to Key Audit Matters (KAM), along with attending regular meetings and gatherings with External Auditors to confirm brainstorming progress, the Audit & Supervisory Board communicate important information to the executive team as needed.
Nomination and Compensation Committee
The Nomination and Compensation Committee, which is chaired by an Outside Director and consists of Outside Directors, who are in the majority of the Board of Directors, the Chairperson of the Board, and Representative Directors, reports on the personnel and remuneration of Directors, Executive Officers and other officers in response to requests from the Chairperson of the Board of Directors or Chairperson of the Audit & Supervisory Board, from the point of view of ensuring objectivity, transparency, and validity in the process of decision.
The Nomination and Compensation Committee is administered in line with the regulations for the Nomination and Compensation Committee. This committee has the authority to state the opinions in response to requests from the chairperson of the Board of Directors regarding the decision of the candidates for the Directors and the Audit & Supervisory Board Members, the appointment of executive officers, etc. and the compensation assessment process of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members. The chairperson of the Board of Directors must report the response of the Nomination and Compensation Committee in the Board of Directors meetings regarding the decision of the candidates for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members and the decision on compensation for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members. The Board of Directors meets to make decisions concerning these topics in consideration of responses from the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
The activities of the Nomination and Compensation Committee are as follows.
Number of meetings of the Nomination and Compensation Committee in FY2025/3: 10
The number of Committee agenda items are as follows.
| Agenda Category | Number |
|---|---|
| Appointment of Executive Officers, etc. | 12 |
| Compensation for Executive Officers, etc. | 3 |
| Appointment of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 7 |
| Compensation for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 9 |
| Total | 31 |
Executive Officers
The Company has an Executive Officer System in order to clearly delineate decision-making and supervisory functions from business execution functions and further energize corporate management through swift decision-making.
The Company’s 17 Executive Officers (four of whom are also Directors) execute operations as heads of SBUs, sites, or corporate divisions or as presidents of Group companies.
In accordance with the Rules Concerning Circulars (rules relating to job functions) these Executive Officers are given a certain measure of decision-making authority that they exercise to make swift decisions after accurately assessing business opportunities. Certain committees have an Executive Officer nominated by the President and CEO to serve as Chairperson in overseeing efforts to develop driven, responsible managers that will achieve the aims of the medium-term strategy and long-term vision of the Company.
These Executive Officers report important matters concerning business execution at monthly Board of Directors meetings and take advice from Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members to serve in supervising the Board of Directors.
Management Meetings
In the course of the President and CEO carrying out basic policies on corporate management as determined by the Board of Directors, the Management Meetings holds discussions and makes decisions about important business plans and business execution plans, as well as individual business operation execution.
Generally meeting twice a month, the committee consists of the President and CEO as well as Directors (excluding Outside Directors) and Executive Officers nominated by the President and CEO. The committee also has one Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member that gives their views on matters when needed.
The committee reports on the progress and results of its proceedings at monthly Board of Directors meetings and takes advice from Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members to serve in supervising the Board of Directors.
Composition of Each Body and Status of Director Activities (as of the end of June, 2025)
Scroll left or right
| Name | Position | Term in Office | Independent Director | Execution of Operations | Board of Directors (FY2024/3 Attendance) | Audit & Supervisory Board (FY2024/3 Attendance) | Nomination and Compensation Committee (FY2024/3 Attendance) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoshimi Ogawa | Chairperson of the Board | 14 years | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
Chairperson of Board of Directors | |||
| Yasuhiro Sakaki | President and CEO | 5 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (-) |
|||
| Kotaro Sugimoto | Representative Director | 6 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
| Toshio Shiwaku | Director | 1 years | ● | ● (100%) |
||||
| Naotaka Kawaguchi | Director | 1 years | ● | ● (100%) |
||||
| Teisuke Kitayama | Outside Director | 7 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
| Toshio Asano | Outside Director | 6 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
Chairperson of the Nomination and Compensation Committee | ||
| Yuriya Komatsu | Outside Director | 3 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
| Mari Okajima | Outside Director | 2 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
| Keita Nishiyama | Outside Director | 2 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
| Seiji Kito (New appointment) |
Outside Director | - | ● | ● (-) |
● (-) |
|||
| Mikio Yagi | Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 2 years | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
Chairperson of the Audit & Supervisory Board | |||
| Junichi Mizuo | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 7 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
| Hideo Makuta | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 5 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
| Hisae Kitayama | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 3 years | ● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
*Attendance rate is for FY2025/3.
Effectiveness Evaluation of the Board of Directors
Every year, Daicel conducts and publicly releases a summary of an effectiveness evaluation of the Board of Directors, which aims to maintain and improve the Board’s performance and find the most suitable approach to corporate governance.
FY2025/3 Initiatives Based on the FY2024/3 Effectiveness Evaluation
In view of the Effectiveness Evaluation of FY2024/3, in FY2025/3 we spent more time reporting on the status of execution of management strategies, matters related to return on capital and stock prices, and the status of initiatives related to sustainability and human capital in order to further enhance discussions at the Board of Directors. We also focused on explaining individual proposals linked to portfolio management.
Summary of the Evaluation Process and Results
Scroll left or right
| Evaluation process | Questionnaires were distributed to all Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members, and individual interviews were conducted based on their responses to further investigate the issues. These results were then compiled and analyzed by the Secretariat and reported to and discussed by the Board of Directors. |
|---|---|
| Main evaluation items |
|
| Overview of evaluation results | Members of the Board of Directors engaged in productive discussions with Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members who actively offered their opinions, and we were able to confirm that the effectiveness of the board is generally satisfactory. On the other hand, it was confirmed that there are issues to be discussed for further improvement of effectiveness. The main issues raised were as follows:
|
| Actions to be taken | We will discuss the above issues at the Board of Directors meeting for FY2026/3 and confirm our commitment to continue addressing them in order to further enhance effectiveness. |
Internal Audit
Daicel has established an Auditing Division, Corporate Compliance Program, and Safety and Quality Auditing Division as internal audit units, and works to enhance the effectiveness of audits while communicating with Audit & Supervisory Board Members as appropriate.
| Auditing Division | The Auditing Division, in cooperation with the internal audit organization of the Daicel Group, conducts annual audits of each site, including Group companies. In addition, based on the results of audits, it supports the appropriate business activities of the audited organization by proposing improvements to problems. It regularly reports audit results to the Board of Directors and the Audit & Supervisory Board |
|---|---|
| Corporate Compliance Program | |
| Safety and Quality Auditing Division, Assessment Headquarters |
The Safety and Quality Auditing Division conducts annual audits on safety,* quality, and the environment at each site, including Group companies. The results of audits are not only fed back to the audited organizations, but are also shared across the entire Group to promote improvements. It regularly reports audit results to the Management Meetings and the Audit & Supervisory Board. *“Safety” includes occupational health and safety. |
Appointment and Compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
Appointment and Nomination Procedures for Directors and Senior Management
In nominating and appointing Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members, and management executives such as Executive Officers, Daicel seeks individuals with the right personality, knowledge, motivation, ethical stance and management perspectives for leading the Company and who meet the basic criteria of supporting and upholding the Daicel Group’s Basic Philosophy, Sustainable Management Policy, Daicel Group Code of Conduct, and Ethical Standards of Daicel Group, and possess the necessary credentials and experience for enhancing Daicel’s medium- and long-term corporate value.
The Board of Directors decides on nominations and appointments based on the advice of the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
Daicel has declared its support for the Challenge Initiatives for 30% of executives* to be women by 2030 (#Here We Go 203030), sponsored by Keidanren. Daicel has positioned Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DE&I) as a key materiality. The Company will seek to further enhance our corporate value by combining the power of diverse human resources, including women.
*Executives include senior managers, such as Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members, and Executive Officers.
Reasons for Appointment and Status of Activities of Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members
Daicel appoints its Outside Directors in accordance with its own Standards for Independence of Outside Directors/Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members, which require that Outside Directors be sufficiently independent and present no risk of conflicts of interest with general shareholders. Daicel also designates all Outside Directors who satisfy the independence criteria as independent Directors.
Reasons for Appointment of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members (as of the end of June, 2025)
Scroll left or right
| Directors | Position | Reason for Appointment |
|---|---|---|
| Yoshimi Ogawa | Chairperson of the Board | Through a long career centered on the Production Technology and Responsible Care divisions, Mr. Ogawa has a proven track record of innovation in the operation of our production bases, and served as our President and CEO for approximately 6 years from June 2019, strongly leading the entire Daicel Group with a focus on enhancing corporate value. Based on these achievements and extensive experience, knowledge, and insights in all aspects of our management, we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management. |
| Yasuhiro Sakaki | President and CEO | Through a long career in Daicel's Safety segment, as a president of an overseas subsidiaries, and in the departments involved in promoting corporate strategy, Mr. Sakaki has played a central role in our management both domestically and internationally. Furthermore, since becoming a Director, he has been responsible for numerous segments such as Material, Smart, and Life Sciences, in addition to formulating and promoting our mid-term strategy, and has worked diligently to expand their business scope. Based on these achievements and extensive experience, knowledge, and insights in all aspects of our management, we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management. |
| Kotaro Sugimoto | Representative Director | Through a long career mainly in our financial and accounting, compliance, and other management divisions, and at the Raw Material Purchasing Center, Mr. Sugimoto has dedicated efforts to strengthening our corporate governance system, which forms the foundation of our management. Furthermore, since becoming a Director, he has played a central role in formulating the personnel system, promoting DE&I initiatives, and driving sustainable management and digital strategies. Based on these achievements and extensive experience, knowledge, and insights in all aspects of our management, we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management. |
| Toshio Shiwaku | Director | Based on a long career at Polyplastics Co., Ltd., a major subsidiary, primarily in research and development, management strategy, and new business development, Mr. Shiwaku contributed to the global expansion of the company as its Representative Director and President. Furthermore, since becoming an Executive Officer of our Company, he has utilized extensive experience, knowledge, and insights in Daicel Group company management and overseas business, contributing to strengthening research and development, safety, quality, and compliance within the Group as the General Manager of the Assessment Headquarters and General Manager of the R&D Headquarters, among other roles. Based on these achievements, we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management. |
| Naotaka Kawaguchi | Director | Through a long career centered on the production technology division, Safety segment, and production division, and as president of an overseas subsidiary, Mr. Kawaguchi has diligently worked on formulating and implementing measures to improve our production technology and resolve challenges. Furthermore, since becoming an Executive Officer, he has played a central role in improving productivity and exploring technological innovation at our production bases, while also broadly serving as the head of an overseas subsidiary. Based on these achievements and extensive experience, knowledge, and insights in all aspects of our management and production technology we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management. |
| Teisuke Kitayama | Outside Director | Mr. Kitayama possesses extensive knowledge and experience as a manager cultivated in the management of financial institutions, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Toshio Asano | Outside Director | Mr. Asano possesses extensive knowledge and experience as a manager cultivated in the management of chemical product manufacturing and sales companies, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Yuriya Komatsu | Outside Director | Ms. Komatsu possesses extensive knowledge and experience as a manager cultivated in the management of Japanese and international investment companies and information and communications companies, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Mari Okajima | Outside Director | Ms. Okajima possesses highly specialized knowledge and broad insights as an academic researcher conducting various studies related to customer satisfaction, SDGs, and other social issues, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Keita Nishiyama | Outside Director | Mr. Nishiyama possesses deep knowledge of economic and industrial policy and IT policy cultivated through work in the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, as well as extensive knowledge as a manager cultivated in power companies and investment companies, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Seiji Kito | Outside Director | Mr. Kito possesses extensive knowledge and experience as a manager cultivated in the management of a financial institution, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
Scroll left or right
| Audit & Supervisory Board Members | Position | Reason for Appointment |
|---|---|---|
| Mikio Yagi | Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Yagi has served as the President and CEO of a Group company as well as the responsible person for the Safety segment, etc. Given his insights from by his extensive experience and special expertise in the fields related to production, sales, product quality, etc. of Daicel, we determined that he is qualified to serve as an Audit & Supervisory Member responsible for implementing audits based on a neutral and objective perspective to ensure sound management at Daicel. |
| Junichi Mizuo | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Mizuo possesses highly specialized knowledge and experience as a scholar of CSR, corporate governance, and business ethics. He has also served as an Outside Director and is experienced in practical business operations. For these and other reasons, we have determined that he is qualified for the post of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member. |
| Hideo Makuta | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Makuta possesses highly specialized knowledge and extensive insights as an attorney at law and has served as a prosecutor at the Supreme Prosecutors Office, a member of the Fair-Trade Commission, and an outside officer of companies. Given this track record, we have determined that he is qualified for the post of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member. |
| Hisae Kitayama | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Ms. Kitayama possesses highly specialized knowledge and extensive insights as a certified public accountant and has served as a partner at a major auditing firm and an executive for an association of certified public accountants.She also has experience with corporate affairs as an Outside Director. For these and other reasons, we have determined that she is qualified for the post of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member. |
*The Directors were appointed on June 20, 2025. The Audit & Supervisory Board Members were appointed on the day of the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held in previous fiscal years.
Directors’ and Auditors’ Primary Areas of Knowledge and Experience (Skill Matrix)
Scroll left or right
| Name | Corporate management | Global management | Marketing /Business planning | Technology/R&D | Finance and accounting | Legal affairs, intellectual property, risk management | DX | Sustainability | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environment | Diversity, Equity & Inclusion | ||||||||||
| Directors | Yoshimi Ogawa | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
| Yasuhiro Sakaki | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
| Kotaro Sugimoto | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
| Toshio Shiwaku | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
| Naotaka Kawaguchi | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
| Teisuke Kitayama | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
| Toshio Asano | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
| Yuriya Komatsu | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
| Mari Okajima | Outside | ● | ● | ● | |||||||
| Keita Nishiyama | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
| Seiji Kito | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
| Audit & Supervisory Board Members | Mikio Yagi | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
| Junichi Mizuo | Outside | ● | ● | ● | |||||||
| Hideo Makuta | Outside | ● | ● | ● | |||||||
| Hisae Kitayama | Outside | ● | ● | ● | |||||||
*Up to five items that are particularly expected of each person are listed. The above matrix does not represent all the knowledge and experience of each person.
Compensation for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
- 1Basic Policy
- (1)The Compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members shall be determined by Board of Directors’ resolutions for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members’ discussions for Audit & Supervisory Board Members, within the scope of the total amount of compensation, etc. approved at the General Meeting of Shareholders.
- (2)The Compensation of Directors shall consist of monthly compensation, performance-based bonuses, and stock compensation, which will generally be paid according at a 55:30:15 ratio that is subject to change according to the position. This rule does not apply to Outside Directors, who shall be paid only monthly compensation. The compensation of Audit & Supervisory Board Members shall consist solely of monthly compensation.
- (3)To ensure objectivity, transparency, and validity regarding compensation, the Board of Directors makes its decisions following deliberations based on recommendations made by the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
- 2Basic Policy on Compensation
-
(1)Monthly Compensation
In principle, the monthly compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members is a fixed amount paid in accordance with internal rules that are determined by the Directors’ duties and job titles in business execution and whether or not the Audit & Supervisory Board Members are fulltime.
Regarding monthly compensation, the Company has revised the compensation to an appropriate and fair level reflective of its business performance, accomplishment of medium- and long-term business plans, and social situations, among other factors. -
(2)Performance-linked Remuneration
Performance-linked remuneration of Directors is paid in accordance with the accomplishment of performance indicators designated by the Board of Directors.
Currently, net sales, EBITDA, and ROIC are used. The basic amount of the performance-based bonus is calculated by multiplying the rank-based amount with a payment rate that fluctuates between 0% and 200%, depending on the level of accomplishment of the performance indicators. The payout rates linked to the weight and achievement rate of each indicator are calculated as shown in the table below.Indicator Weight Target achievement rate Coefficient Consolidated net sales 40% 120% or more 200% More than 100% but less than 120% *1 100% 100% More than 80% but less than 100% *2 80% or less 0% EBITDA 40% 120% or more 200% More than 100% but less than 120% *1 100% 100% More than 80% but less than 100% *2 80% or less 0% ROIC 20% 120% or more 200% More than 100% but less than 120% *1 100% 100% More than 80% but less than 100% *2 80% or less 0% - *1These bonuses are proportional to the percentage that the target figure was achieved, within a range of 101% to 199%.
- *2These bonuses are proportional to the percentage that the target figure was achieved, within a range of 1% to 99%.
The final amounts of performance-based bonuses are determined by assessing the status of each Director from the perspectives of practicing Sustainable Management Policy and accomplishing Mid-Term Management Strategy and adding or subtracting up to 20% to or from the basic amounts of the performance-based bonuses.
-
(3)Restricted Stock Compensation System
Daicel introduced the Restricted Stock Compensation System to step up value sharing with shareholders and motivate Directors to contribute more to medium- to long-term improvement in corporate value. The stocks cannot be transferred for a period of 30 years, and the Board of Directors decides on an amount for each eligible individual, which is then divided by the stock price at a certain point to calculate the number of shares to be awarded.
-
(1)Monthly Compensation
*The executive compensation system is current as of April 1, 2025. Daicel does not have a system for paying retirement benefits to officers.
FY2025/3 Total Compensation
Scroll left or right
| Category | Number of Recipients | Amount (Annual) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash Compensation | Stock-based Compensation | Total | |||
| Monthly Compensation | Performance-based Bonus | ||||
| Directors | 12 | 304 million yen | 79 million yen | 67 million yen | 451 million yen |
| (Outside Directors) | (6) | (79 million yen) | (–) | (–) | (79 million yen) |
| Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 6 | 111 million yen | – | – | 111 million yen |
| (Outside Members) | (3) | (39 million yen) | (–) | (–) | (39 million yen) |
| Total | 18 | 415 million yen | 79 million yen | 67 million yen | 563 million yen |
*A resolution of the 158th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 21, 2024, held the amount of compensation for Directors to a maximum of 640 million yen annually (including compensation for Outside Directors to a maximum of 140 million yen annually).
*A resolution of the 158th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 21, 2024, held the amount of compensation for Audit & Supervisory Board Members to a maximum of 130 million yen annually.
Return of Stock Compensation
For the purpose of ensuring the soundness of the stock compensation system for Directors, the Board of Directors has established a provision to confiscate all or part of the stock-compensation before or after the lifting of the transfer restriction at the discretion of the Board of Directors in the event of a certain reason such as an unlawful act.
Training for Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members and Executive Officers
Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members attend external seminars and training sessions in order to accomplish such things as acquiring the knowledge necessary for the performance of their duties and work tasks, as well as to update their skills. The Company bears the costs of these activities.
It also provides annual compliance training for Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members, Executive Officers, and other employees such as senior employees (excluding Outside Directors).
In addition, we provide opportunities for Outside Directors to tour our manufacturing sites and receive an explanation of Daicel’s business activities so they can better understand our business and utilize their knowledge in discussions within Board of Directors meetings.
In FY2025/3, we conducted activities such as tours of the Harima and Aboshi plants, executive training on corporate ethics, explained the business of the Life Sciences SBU, Healthcare SBU, and Smart SBU, and reported on our sustainability activities.
Establishment of the Internal Control System
Daicel develops and manages a system of internal controls under its Basic Policy for Structuring the Internal Control System to ensure the appropriateness of its business operations as stipulated under Japan’s Companies Act.
Furthermore, Daicel has established the Internal Control Council chaired by a senior managing executive officer, who concurrently serves as the general manager of the Corporate Support Headquarters and comprising general managers of corporate departments as members, to accurately grasp the status of the establishment and management of these systems and to discuss related measures toward ultimately ensuring the effectiveness of internal controls throughout the Group.
Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Members also attend meetings held by the council as observers. The council provides a report on its activities to the Audit & Supervisory Board and Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors has confirmed that the Basic Policy is being implemented appropriately.
Basic Policy for Structuring Internal Control Systems[PDF:107KB]
Policy Regarding Cross-Holding of Shares
Policy on Cross-Holding of Shares
Daicel only adheres to a shareholding policy insofar as it is judged to contribute to the improvement of the medium- and long-term corporate value of Daicel Group from the perspectives of, for example, strengthening business relationships, maintaining the stability of transactions with financial institutions, and maintaining or strengthening cooperative business relationships.
When any stocks do not meet the purpose of our possession or are not recognized as being economically rational due to changes in the business environment or other factors, we will reduce them accordingly.
We regularly review the purpose and appropriateness of all stocks we hold, as well as the quantitative and qualitative benefits of our business transactions and the economic practicality of the risk of such transactions. The results of these reviews are reported to the Board of Directors, which examines their content.
Cross Shareholdings of the Company (investment shares held for purposes other than to be net assets)
In line with the above-mentioned policy, in FY2025/3 the Company sold all shares of six securities and some shares of two securities out of 20 listed securities held by the Company. We also decreased shares of one unlisted security due to liquidation. As of the end of FY2025/3, the Company held 40 stocks for a balance sheet amount of ¥45.9 billion. The Company proceeded with the sale of strategic shareholdings as planned, and the drop in share prices has decreased the market value of shares. This resulted in a decrease in the amount recorded on the balance sheet.
Scroll left or right
| FY2022/3 | FY2023/3 | FY2024/3 | FY2025/3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of brands of stocks (brands) | Unlisted stocks | 27 | 26 | 27 | 26 |
| Listed stocks | 25 | 22 | 20 | 14 | |
| Total | 52 | 48 | 47 | 40 | |
| Amount reported in the balance sheet (billions of yen) |
Unlisted stocks | 13 | 13 | 19 | 10 |
| Listed stocks | 653 | 576 | 692 | 449 | |
| Total | 666 | 589 | 712 | 459 | |
| Ratio of consolidated net assets (%) | 23.7 | 19.0 | 19.0 | 12.2 | |
Cross Shareholdings (top 10 securities) (as of March 31, 2025)
Scroll left or right
| Stock | No. of Shares | Amount Reported in Balance Sheet at Fiscal Year-end (Millions of yen) | Purpose of Shareholding |
|---|---|---|---|
| FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation | 10,443,747 | 29,707 | Given our business transactions involving cellulose acetate and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Japan Tobacco Inc. | 1,500,000 | 6,171 | Given our business transactions involving acetate tow and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd | 813,300 | 2,518 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD. | 156,000 | 2,517 | We have continuously held the shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company in pursuing joint development of products and other activities. |
| Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 327,660 | 1,243 | We have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company to ensure stable financial and settlement operations for the Daicel Group. |
| Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd. | 369,700 | 991 | Given our business transactions involving automobile airbag inflators and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Osaka Soda Co., Ltd. | 324,000 | 526 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Nihon Plast Co., Ltd. | 1,000,000 | 333 | Given our business transactions involving inflators for automobile airbags and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Osaka Organic Chemical Industry Ltd. | 109,500 | 267 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals, and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. | 111,120 | 258 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals, and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
Cross Shareholdings of the Company (total investment securities and deemed holdings of shares for purposes other than to be net assets)
Scroll left or right
| FY2022/3 | FY2023/3 | FY2024/3 | FY2025/3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total amount of cross-shareholdings (billions of yen) | 891 | 730 | 925 | 638 |
| Ratio of consolidated net assets (%) | 31.9 | 23.5 | 24.7 | 17.0 |
Plan for Future Stockholding Reductions
In light of various circumstances that include the impact on the market and the financial strategies of the issuing entity, the Company plans to sell any stock that fails to satisfy our purpose for shareholding or that is deemed to be no longer economically practical due to factors that include changes in the business environment.
The balance of cross shareholdings not including deemed holdings of shares and cross shareholdings including deemed holdings of shares as a proportion of consolidated net assets in FY2026/3 is expected to be as shown below.
In addition, the reduction plan has not been revised since the external announcement on May 11, 2023. The disposal plan from FY2027/3 will be considered when formulating the next medium-term plan.
Scroll left or right
| FY2026/3 | |
|---|---|
| Total amount of cross-shareholdings (excluding deemed holdings of shares) (billions of yen) |
297 |
| Ratio of consolidated net assets (%) | 7.7 |
| Total amount of cross-shareholdings (including deemed holdings of shares) (billions of yen) |
476 |
| Ratio of consolidated net assets (%) | 12.3 |
*The Company’s reduction plan is based on current information obtained by the Company and on certain assumptions deemed to be reasonable. Actual figures may diverge from the plan due to various factors.
Communication with Shareholders and Investors
Appropriate Information Disclosure and Constructive Dialogue
Daicel encourages fair evaluation of its corporate value by following its Disclosure Policy to foster accurate understanding of the Company among its stakeholders, including shareholders and investors. With the aim of building relationships of trust with all its stakeholders, Daicel has disclosed corporate information in a timely, impartial, accurate, and proactive manner on an ongoing basis. We also carry out IR activities to engage in dialogue with our shareholders and investors to further enhance our corporate value.
Disclosure Policy (including Basic Policy on Information Disclosure)
General Meeting of Shareholders
We have considered the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders as a valuable opportunity to engage with our shareholders. For this reason, Daicel posts the convocation notice for its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on its website prior to distributing it by postal mail, aiming to provide shareholders with sufficient time to examine the agenda items. Moreover, to ensure that as many shareholders as possible exercise their voting rights, we offer voting alternatives via postal mail or the Internet, using computers, smartphones and other devices, for those who are unable to attend the meeting.
To facilitate further understanding of initiatives of the Daicel Group, we are striving to provide easy-to-understand answers to questions voiced by shareholders.
At the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 21 2024, we resumed the post-meeting reception, which had been suspended since the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing for deeper dialogue between shareholders and the Company’s executives.
IR Activities
Under the supervision of the officer in charge of IR, the Company promotes IR activities in cooperation with the management team including the President and CEO, and related departments such as the IR department. In line with the forementioned Basic Policy on Information Disclosure, Daicel adopts a proactive approach toward its IR activities.
By holding quarterly financial briefing session and things such as individual interviews, interviews at conferences sponsored by securities companies, and IR events, the Company strives to promote communication, aspiring to foster better understanding of the Daicel Group among institutional investors. In FY2025/3, we held a tour of the Himeji Production Sector/Aboshi Plant as an opportunity to promote a better understanding of the Daicel Group's businesses.
We provide information to individual investors through our corporate website, and strive to enhance its content so that they can understand the Daicel Group in an easier-to-understand manner. Furthermore, in FY2025/3, we also provided opportunities to deepen understanding of the Daicel Group and receive feedback by distributing a company profile video through a security company website and conducting web surveys targeting individual investors.
Please follow this link to sign up for our investor relations email newsletter.
FY2025/3 Main Activities
Scroll left or right
| Activity | Frequency | Outline |
|---|---|---|
| Financial briefing sessions for analysts and institutional investors | 4 | Held briefings on a quarterly basis (the second and fourth quarter briefings were hosted by the President and CEO, while the first and third quarter briefings were hosted by the Division Manager of the Investor Relations Department) |
| Individual interviews with analysts and institutional investors | 160 | Hosted by the Investor Relations Department centered on the Division Manager of the Investor Relations Department or the officer in charge of IR |
| Event for analysts and institutional investors | 1 | Held a tour of Himeji Production Sector/Aboshi Plant |
| Participation in conferences for institutional investors | 3 | The officer in charge of IR and the Division Manager of the Investor Relations Department participated in conferences in Japan for mainly overseas institutional investors held by securities companies |
Feedback on Dialogue with Shareholders and Investors
The IR department informs management and related departments as needed about the content of dialogues with shareholders and investors, their opinions and requests, and the content of analyst reports. In addition, the officer in charge of IR reports the dialogue to the Board of Directors and the IR department reports it to the management team on a quarterly basis at the meetings, which is used in discussions aimed at improving our corporate value.