Sustainability / GovernanceCorporate Governance
- Basic Approach
- History of Strengthening Corporate Governance
- Corporate Governance Framework
- Effectiveness Evaluation of the Board of Directors
- Appointment and Compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
- Policy Regarding Cross-Holding of Shares
- Communication with Shareholders and Investors
Basic Approach
Strengthening corporate governance is an important management task that enables us to enhance corporate value and achieve our social mission and responsibilities as a listed company.
Daicel maintains its agility by clarifying the responsibilities of each part of its organization and by adopting a management system that supports timely decision-making and implementation. Moreover, by actively soliciting external opinions to improve management transparency and fairness, Daicel will strive to maintain the soundness of its corporate management.
History of Strengthening Corporate Governance
Scroll left or right
Date | Initiative | Purpose |
---|---|---|
June 1999 | Introduced the Executive Officer System | To separate supervisory and business execution functions clearly |
June 2000 | Appointed Outside Directors | To strengthen decision-making and supervisory functions and ensure transparency in management |
Established the Nomination and Compensation Committee | To improve objectivity and transparency in the nomination and compensation assessment process | |
June 2003 | Shortened the term of office for Directors from two years to one | To clarify management responsibilities of Directors to shareholders To build a system that responds quickly to changes |
March 2006 | Established the Information Disclosure Committee | To ensure reliability of the information to be disclosed |
April 2006 | Established the Risk Management Committee | To accurately understand and appropriately manage risks |
May 2006 | Established the Basic Policy on Building an Internal Control System | To develop an internal control structure |
August 2010 | Established the Internal Control Council | To build an internal control system and ensure the adequateness of its operation |
June 2015 | Increased the ratio of Outside Directors to 50% | To ensure further transparency of decision-making and supervisory functions and management |
January 2016 | Started to evaluate the effectiveness of the Board of Directors | To maintain and improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors |
January 2020 | Improved the method for evaluating the effectiveness of the Board of Directors | To introduce individual interviews in addition to surveys |
April 2022 | Partially revised the Basic Policy on Building an Internal Control System | To make revisions based on internal environment changes, including organization changes |
Corporate Governance Framework
Based on our Basic Philosophy: “The company making lives better by co-creating value”, the Company recognizes that the strengthening of corporate governance is an important management issue to contribute to the various stakeholders for their benefit through improving corporate value.
The Company establishes a management system with efficiency and mobility and institution that can promptly adapt to the changes in the business environment., as well as ensuring both the transparency and legitimacy of management. Thus, the Company strives to maintain the corporate governance framework with high effectiveness to continuously improve corporate value.
Outline of the Corporate Governance Framework (as of June 22, 2022)
The Company appoints Outside Directors to apply their expertise by providing opinions and advice. The Outside Directors account for the majority of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Company expects the Outside Directors to strengthen the appropriateness of the decisions made by its Board of Directors and the supervision of the execution of Director duties. On the other hand, the Company has adopted an Executive Officer system. The adoption of this system has enabled the Company to clearly separate its decision-making, supervisory, and business execution functions. Such a clear division of roles has allowed the Company to bolster its business management structure so that it has the mobility and institutes that can promptly adapt to the changes in the business environment. The Company strives to improve our corporate value continuously in reasonable consideration of stakeholders.
Scroll left or right
Item | Content |
---|---|
Type of organizational structure | Company with Audit & Supervisory Board |
Chairperson of Board of Directors | Director, Chairperson of Board of Directors |
Number of Directors | 10 (including 2 female directors) |
Number of Outside Directors | 6 (all 6 are independent directors) |
Number of Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 5 (including 1 female Audit & Supervisory Board Member) |
Number of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 3 (all 3 are independent Audit & Supervisory Board Members) |
Number of Executive Officers | 22 (including 4 officers concurrently serving as directors) |
Number of Board of Director meetings held in FY2022/3 (Average attendance rate of outside directors/outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members) |
15 (96.0%/95.6%) |
Number of Audit & Supervisory Board meetings held in FY2022/3 (Average attendance rate of outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members) |
15 (95.6%) |
Term of office for directors | 1 year |
Term of office for Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 4 years |
Average term in office for directors | 3.6 years |
Average term in office for Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 2.2 years |
Voluntary advisory body to the Board of Directors | Nomination and Compensation Committee is composed of 8 Directors (including 6 Outside Directors) and chaired by an Outside Director. Meetings held in FY2022/3: 9 |
Compensation system for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members* |
|
External Auditor | Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC |
*The compensation system also applies to executive officers and others.
The ratio between the three types of compensations (1, 2, and 3) is roughly maintained at 65:20:15.
Corporate Governance Framework (as of June 22, 2022)

Board of Directors
The Company recognizes a role of Board of Directors as following; Setting the direction we should aim for and creating a concrete business strategy toward the target, Supervising the execution of business and business operations from the objective point of view. Ensuring this effectiveness of the role of Board of Directors, it is constituted of four Inside Directors and six Outside Directors; the former have a profound insight about our businesses, the latter have a wealth of experience in the business management and diverse expertise (including eight men and two women in the Board as a whole). Also, all of Outside Directors are independent. The details about them are indicated in the part titled “Information about Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members” in the Securities Report. The Outside Directors satisfy the “Standards for Independence of Outside Directors/Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members” as defined by the Company. Therefore, we organize the Board of Directors in a way that allows the Outside Directors, who are in a majority on the Board of Directors, to state their opinions to the Company’s management from the objective and independent directors’ point of view.
The Board of Directors has a meeting once a month as a general rule. The Board of Directors meets to make decisions concerning important management issues in line with the regulations for the Board of Directors.
In addition, five Audit & Supervisory Board Members, three of whom are the Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members, also attend the Board of Directors meetings, where they express their opinions appropriately in case of necessity.
The term of office for Daicel’s Directors is one year. This short term of office enables Daicel shareholders to increase their involvement in the appointment of Directors. At the same time, it allows the Company to better clarify the management responsibilities of its Directors and thereby strengthen its corporate governance.
It is necessary for each Director to develop his/her knowledge of our business to ensure effective supervision of the execution of business. Therefore, we provide opportunities for mainly Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members to tour our manufacturing sites and provide an explanation of Daicel’s departments, products and technologies as well as the Board of Directors’ meetings.
Audit & Supervisory Board
The Audit & Supervisory Board comprises five members (four men and one woman), and a majority of three members are independent Audit & Supervisory Board Members that meet the Standards for Independence of Outside Directors/Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members. Audit & Supervisory Board Members possess extensive experience and wide-ranging knowledge concerning accounting, finance, legal affairs, management, and other disciplines, and fulfill auditing functions from a third-party, independent standpoint.
The Audit & Supervisory Board holds meeting to share information, deliberate on, and make decisions about important issues related to the Company’s audits. It also regularly attends the Board of Directors meetings and important internal meetings held by Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Members, and regularly meets with the Representative Director, Outside Directors, and External Auditors. In addition, it works to improve auditing effectiveness through such means as communicating with the Auditing Office, the Company’s internal auditing division, as needed.
Nomination and Compensation Committee
The Nomination and Compensation Committee, which is chaired by Outside Directors and consists of Outside Directors, who are in the majority of the Board of Directors, the Chairperson of the Board of Directors, and Representative Directors, reports on the personnel and remuneration of Directors, Executive Officers and other officers in response to requests from the Chairperson of the Board of Directors or Chairperson of the Audit & Supervisory Board, from the point of view of ensuring objectivity, transparency, and validity in the process of decision.
The Nomination and Compensation Committee is administered in line with the regulations for the Nomination and Compensation Committee. This committee has the authority to state the opinions in response to requests from the chairperson of the Board of Directors regarding the decision of the candidates for the Directors and the Audit & Supervisory Board Members, the appointment of executive officers, etc. and the compensation assessment process of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members. The chairperson of the Board of Directors must report the response of the Nomination and Compensation Committee in the Board of Directors meetings regarding the decision of the candidates for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members and the decision on compensation for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members. The Board of Directors meets to make decisions concerning these topics in consideration of responses from the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
Executive Officers
The Company has adopted an Executive Officer System. This system has enabled the Company to isolate its decision-making, supervisory structure, and, consequently, its corporate activities in a clear manner. through reinforcing the system of business execution by prompt decision-making for active corporate management.
Currently, this system comprises 21 Executive Officers (four of whom serve concurrently as Directors).
The Executive Officers include the officers in charge of SBU (Strategic Business Unit), heads of SBU, heads of in-house companies, heads of sites, heads of corporate divisions, and the presidents of Group Companies, who administer corporate affairs.
Each Executive Officer is given definite authorities in line with the regulation approval processes (the regulation of administrative authority). The Executive Officers seek to make decisions promptly, taking business opportunities appropriately. In addition, the Company is committed to developing human resources with a sense of independence and responsibility who deserve board members by delegating authority to promote the Mid-Term Strategy and Long-Term Vision. For example, the executive officers appointed by the President and CEO serve as chairs of some committees. On the other hand, important subjects of all the execution of duties are reported in the Board of Directors meetings every month in line with the regulations of the Board of Directors. The Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members indicate and advise that the execution of duties conducted by executive officers is controlled by the supervision of the Board of Directors.
Management Meetings
Daicel has established the Management Meetings as a body to deliberate on and make decisions about prior to its President & CEO implementing the basic corporate management policies formulated by the Board of Directors.
The Management Meetings consists of the President & CEO, Directors (excluding Outside Directors) and the Executive Officers selected by the President & CEO as its members. The Management Meetings convene, in principle, twice a month. Also, two Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Members attend the meetings and they can express their opinions appropriately in case of necessity.
The processes and results of the meetings are reported at the Board of Directors’ meetings every month in line with the regulations of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members indicate and advise that the execution of duties conducted by executive officers is controlled by the supervision of the Board of Directors.
Composition of Each Body and Status of Director Activities (as of June 22, 2022)
Scroll left or right
Name | Position | Term in Office | Independent Director | Execution of operations | Board of Directors (FY2022/3 Attendance) | Audit & Supervisory Board (FY2022/3 Attendance) | Nomination and Compensation Committee (FY2022/3 Attendance) | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yoshimi Ogawa | Representative Director President and CEO | 11 years |
● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
Chairperson of Board of Directors | ||
Kotaro Sugimoto | Representative Director | 3 years |
● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
Yasuhiro Sakaki | Director | 2 years |
● | ● (100%) |
||||
Akihisa Takabe | Director | 3 years |
● | ● (100%) |
||||
Masafumi Nogimori | Outside Director | 5 years |
● | ● (93.3%) |
● (100%) |
Chairperson of the Nomination and Compensation Committee | ||
Teisuke Kitayama | Outside Director | 4 years |
● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
Sonoko Hacchoji | Outside Director | 3 years |
● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
Toshio Asano | Outside Director | 3 years |
● | ● (93.3%) |
● (91.7%) |
|||
Takeshi Furuichi | Outside Director | 2 years |
● | ● (93.3%) |
● (91.7%) |
|||
Yuriya Komatsu (New appointment) |
Outside Director | - | ● | |||||
Shinji Fujita | Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 3 years |
● (100%) |
● (100%) |
Chairperson of the Audit & Supervisory Board | |||
Hisanori Imanaka | Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 2 years |
● (100%) |
● (100%) |
||||
Junichi Mizuo | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 4 years |
● | ● (100%) |
● (100%) |
|||
Hideo Makuta | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 2 years |
● | ● (93.3%) |
● (93.3%) |
|||
Hisae Kitayama (New appointment) |
Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | - | ● |
*Attendance rate is the actual result in FY2022/3.
Effectiveness Evaluation of the Board of Directors
Daicel conducts an effectiveness evaluation of the Board of Directors once a year to maintain and improve its performance through questionnaires and individual interviews to each board member and Audit & Supervisory Board member.
FY2022/3 Initiatives Based on the FY2021/3 Effectiveness Evaluation
In view of the Effectiveness Evaluation of FY2021/3, in FY2022/3 we took steps to further enhance discussions at meetings of the Board of Directors. This includes enhancing reports on the content of discussions at Management Meetings and other meetings, along with departmental strategies and progress made, as well as spending time discussing management strategies.
FY2022/3 Effectiveness Evaluation of the Board of Directors
Scroll left or right
Evaluation process | Distributed questionnaires to all Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members; further explored questionnaire responses through individual interviews; the results compiled and analyzed by the administrative office were reported and discussed at a Board of Directors Meeting. |
Main themes |
|
Overview of evaluation results |
The Board of Directors engaged in productive discussions with Outside Directors and actively offered their opinions, and we were able to confirm that the board is accomplishing its expected roles effectively. On the other hand, there were some issues that needed to be addressed to improve the board’s effectiveness. The main issues pointed out were:
|
Appointment and Compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
Appointment and Nomination Procedures for Directors and Senior Management
In nominating candidates for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members and appointing management executives such as executive officers, Daicel seeks individuals with the right personality, knowledge, motivation, ethical stance and management perspectives for leading the Company and who meet the basic criteria of supporting and upholding the Daicel Group’s Basic Philosophy, Sustainable Management Policies, Conduct Policy, and Daicel Code of Conduct and possessing the necessary credentials and experience for enhancing Daicel’s medium- and long-term corporate value.
The Board of Directors decides on nominations and appointments based on the advice of the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
Daicel has declared its support for the Challenge Initiatives for 30% of executives to be women by 2030 (#HereWeGo203030), sponsored by Keidanren. Daicel has positioned Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) as a key sustainability issue (materiality). The Company will seek to further enhance our corporate value by combining the power of diverse human resources including women.
*Executives includes senior managers such as Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members, and executive officers.
Reasons for Appointment and Status of Activities of Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members
Daicel appoints its Outside Directors in accordance with its Standards for Independence of Outside Directors/Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members, which require that Outside Directors be sufficiently independent and present no risk of conflict of interest with general shareholders. Daicel also designates all Outside Directors who satisfy the independence criteria as independent Directors.
Reasons for Appointment of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members (as of June 22, 2022)
Scroll left or right
Directors | Position | Reason for Appointment |
---|---|---|
Yoshimi Ogawa | Representative Director President and CEO |
Mr. Ogawa has demonstrated strong leadership in guiding the entire Group toward achieving higher corporate value as the President and CEO of the Company since June 2019. We determined that he was qualified to manage the Daicel Group and its global business given his track record and wealth of experience, achievements and insight related to the overall management of Daicel. |
Kotaro Sugimoto | Representative Director | Mr. Sugimoto possesses a wealth of experience, achievements and insight related to the overall management of Daicel, fostered as the head of administrative departments, including finance and accounting as well as compliance. We determined that he was qualified to manage the Daicel Group and its global businesses. |
Yasuhiro Sakaki | Director | Mr. Sakaki possesses a wealth of experience, achievements and insight related to the overall management of Daicel, fostered as head of the Pyrotechnic Devices Business and departments involved in promoting corporate strategy. We determined that he was qualified to manage the Daicel Group and its global businesses. |
Akihisa Takabe | Director | Mr. Takabe possesses a wealth of experience, achievements and insight related to the planning and development of new products at the Daicel Group, fostered as head of R&D and new product development for broad areas including basic technology and product development. We determined that he was qualified to manage the Daicel Group and its global businesses. |
Masafumi Nogimori | Outside Director | Mr. Nogimori possesses a wealth of insights and experience, fostered as a manager of a company that produces and sells medical products, and applies these in the management of Daicel. |
Teisuke Kitayama | Outside Director | Mr. Kitayama possesses a wealth of insights and experience, fostered as a manager of financial institutions, and applies these in the management of Daicel. |
Sonoko Hacchoji | Outside Director | Ms. Hacchoji possesses a wealth of insights and experience, fostered as a member of a management team at financial institutions and a hotel management company, and applies these in the management of Daicel. |
Toshio Asano | Outside Director | Mr. Asano possesses a wealth of insights and experience, fostered as a manager of companies that manufacture and sell chemical goods, and applies these in the management of Daicel. |
Takeshi Furuichi | Outside Director | Mr. Furuichi possesses a wealth of insight and experience fostered as a manager of a financial institution, and applies these in the management of Daicel. |
Yuriya Komatsu | Outside Director | Ms. Komatsu possesses a wealth of insights and experience, fostered as a manager of investment companies and communications companies in Japan and overseas, and applies these in the management of Daicel. |
Scroll left or right
Audit & Supervisory Board Members | Position | Reason for Appointment |
---|---|---|
Shinji Fujita | Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Fujita has been in charge of Daicel’s accounting department for many years. Given this track record, we determined that he was qualified to serve as an Audit & Supervisory Member responsible for implementing audits based on a neutral and objective perspective to ensure sound management at Daicel. |
Hisanori Imanaka | Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Imanaka has been in charge of supervising management across departments as the head of Daicel’s management planning and sustainable management. Given this track record, we determined that he was qualified to serve as an Audit & Supervisory Member responsible for implementing audits based on a neutral and objective perspective to ensure sound management at Daicel. |
Junichi Mizuo | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Mizuo possesses highly specialized knowledge and experience as a scholar of CSR, corporate governance, and business ethics. He has also served as an outside director and is experienced in practical business operations. For these and other reasons, the Company has determined that he is qualified for the post of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member. |
Hideo Makuta | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Makuta possesses highly specialized knowledge and extensive insight as an attorney at law and has served as a prosecutor at the Supreme Prosecutors Office, a member of the Fair Trade Commission, and an outside officer of companies. Given this track record, the Company has determined that he is qualified for the post of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member. |
Hisae Kitayama | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member |
Ms. Kitayama possesses highly specialized knowledge and extensive insight as a certified public accountant and has served as a partner at a major auditing firm and an executive for an association of certified public accountants. She also has experience with corporate affairs as an outside director. For these and other reasons, the Company has determined that she is qualified for the post of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member. |
*Directors were appointed on June 22, 2022, and Audit & Supervisory Board Members were appointed as of the date of the General Meeting of Shareholders held in this fiscal year or the past fiscal years.
Directors' and Auditors' Primary Areas of Knowledge and Experience
Scroll left or right
Name | Business management | Global management | Marketing and business planning | Technology and R&D | Finance and accounting | Legal affairs, intellectual property, risk management | ESG | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Directors | Yoshimi Ogawa | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Kotaro Sugimoto | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Yasuhiro Sakaki | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Akihisa Takabe | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||||
Masafumi Nogimori | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Teisuke Kitayama | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||
Sonoko Hacchoji | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||
Toshio Asano | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Takeshi Furuichi | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Yuriya Komatsu | Outside | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |||
Audit & Supervisory Board Members | Shinji Fujita | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
Hisanori Imanaka | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
Junichi Mizuo | Outside | ● | ● | ||||||
Hideo Makuta | Outside | ● | ● | ● | |||||
Hisae Kitayama | Outside | ● | ● | ● |
Compensation for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
- 1Basic Policy
- (1)Compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members shall be determined by Board of Directors’ resolution for Directors, and Audit & Supervisory Board Members’ discussion for Audit & Supervisory Board Members within the scope of the total amount of compensation, etc., approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders.
- (2)Compensation of Directors shall consist of monthly compensation, performance-based bonuses, and stock compensation, which will generally be paid according at a 65:20:15 ratio. This rule does not apply to Outside Directors, who shall be paid only a monthly compensation. The compensation of Audit & Supervisory Board Members shall consist solely of monthly compensation.
- (3)To ensure objectivity, transparency, and validity regarding compensation, the Board of Directors makes its decision following deliberations based on recommendations made by the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
- 2Basic Policy on Compensation
-
(1)Monthly Compensation
In principle, the monthly compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members is a fixed amount paid in accordance with internal rules that are determined by the Directors’ duties and job titles in business execution and as to whether or not the Audit & Supervisory Board Members are full-time.
Regarding monthly compensation, the Company has revised the compensation to an appropriate and fair level reflective of its business performance, accomplishment of medium- and long-term business plans, and social situation, among other factors. -
(2)Performance-linked remuneration
Performance-linked remuneration of Directors are paid in accordance with the accomplishment of performance indicators designated by the Board of Directors.
Currently, net sales and operating income are used as the indicators to evaluate things such as business growth, market expansion, and improvements in the earning power of our core business. These indicators are given a 50-50 weighting, and the basic amount of the performance-based bonus is calculated by multiplying the rank-based amount with a payout rate that fluctuates between 0% and 200% depending on the level of accomplishment of the performance indicators. The payout rates linked to the indicators are calculated as follows.- Calculate the standard deviation (σ, sigma) based on the average value of net sales over the past five years.
- Draw a line based on three points: the value of net sales for the relevant fiscal year, which serves as an indicator; the value that is 1σ higher than the first figure, and the value that is 1σ lower than the first figure.
- The payout ratio is determined by plotting the actual net sales of the relevant fiscal year on that line.
-
(3)Restricted Stock Compensation System
Daicel introduced Restricted Stock Compensation System to step up value-sharing with shareholders and motivate Directors to contribute more to medium- to long-term improvement in corporate value. The stocks cannot be transferred for a period of 30 years, and the Board of Directors decides on an amount for each eligible individual, which is then divided by the stock price at a certain point to calculate the number of shares to be awarded.
-
(1)Monthly Compensation
*Daicel does not have a system for paying retirement benefits to officers.
FY2022/3 Total Compensation
Scroll left or right
Category | Number of Recipients | Amount (Annual) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash Compensation | Stock-based Compensation | Total | |||
Monthly Compensation | Performance-based Bonus | ||||
Directors | 10 | 325 million yen | 127 million yen | 62 million yen | 515 million yen |
(Outside Directors) | (5) | (66 million yen) | (–) | (–) | (66 million yen) |
Audit & Supervisory Board Members | (5) | 103 million yen | – | – | 103 million yen |
(Outside Members) | (3) | (39 million yen) | (–) | (–) | (39 million yen) |
Total | 15 | 429 million yen | 127 million yen | 62 million yen | 619 million yen |
*A resolution of the 153rd Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 21, 2019, held the amount of compensation for Directors to a maximum of 500 million yen annually. Especially, a resolution of the 156th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 22, 2022, held the amount of compensation for Outside Directors to a maximum of 100 million yen annually.
*A resolution of the 152nd Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 22, 2018, held the amount of compensation for Audit & Supervisory Board Members to a maximum of 120 million yen annually.
Training for Directors and Senior Management
Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members attend external seminars and training sessions in order to accomplish such things as acquiring the knowledge necessary for the performance of their duties and work tasks, as well as update their skills. The Company bears the costs of these activities.
It also provides annual compliance training for Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members, Executive Officers, and other employees such as senior employees (excluding Outside Directors).
In addition, we provide opportunities for Outside Directors to tour our manufacturing sites and receive an explanation of Daicel’s business activities during the Board of Directors’ meetings so they can better understand our business and utilize their knowledge in discussions with in Board of Director’s meeting.
Establishment of the Internal Control System
Daicel develops and manages a system of internal controls under its Basic Policy for Structuring the Internal Control System to ensure the appropriateness of its business operations as stipulated under Japan’s Companies Act.
Furthermore, Daicel has established the Internal Control Council chaired by senior managing executive officer, who concurrently serves as the general manager of the Corporate Support Headquarters, and comprising general managers of corporate departments as members, to accurately grasp the status of the establishment and management of these systems and to discuss related measures toward ultimately ensuring the effectiveness of internal controls throughout the Group. Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Members also attend meetings held by the council as observers. The council provides a report on its activities to the Audit & Supervisory Board and Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors has confirmed that the Basic Policy is being implemented appropriately.
Basic Policy for Structuring Internal Control Systems[PDF:47KB]
Policy Regarding Cross-Holding of Shares
Policy on Cross-Holding of Shares
We only adhere to a shareholding policy insofar as it is judged to contribute to the improvement of medium- and long-term corporate value from the perspectives of, for example, strengthening business relationships, maintaining the stability of transactions with financial institutions, and maintaining or strengthening cooperative business relationships.
When any stocks do not meet the purpose of our possession or are not recognized as being economically rational due to changes in the business environment or other factors, we will reduce them accordingly. As of March 31, 2022, Daicel has cross-holdings of shares in 52 companies (equivalent to 66,585 million yen reported on the balance sheet).
Verification by the Board of Directors
We will periodically verify the appropriateness of things such as the purpose, the quantitative and qualitative benefits arising from business transactions, and the economic rationality of the risks held of all stocks that we possess. We report the results of this verification to the Board of Directors, and the content is examined carefully.
As a result of the verifications, in FY2022/3 we sold all our shareholding in one of three listed stocks and part of our shareholding in two listed stocks. We also sold all our shareholding in one unlisted stock.
Standards Regarding the Exercise of Voting Rights Associated with Cross-Shareholdings
Regarding voting rights related to strategic shareholdings, we exercise those rights with due consideration for avoiding any serious impacts on Daicel and our Group’s purposes of possession, contributing to sustainable growth and enhancing mid- and long-term corporate value of the investee company, and contributing to the common benefits of shareholders.
Status of Cross-Shareholdings (Top 10 Stocks) (as of March 31, 2022)
Scroll left or right
Stock | No. of Shares | Amount Reported in Balance Sheet at Fiscal Year-end (Millions of yen) |
Purpose of Shareholding |
---|---|---|---|
FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation | 5,809,249 | 43,580 | Given our business transactions involving cellulose acetate and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd. | 1,873,409 | 3,696 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. However, we are considering reducing our shareholding as a result of deliberations. |
DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD. | 156,000 | 3,495 | We have continuously held the shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company in pursuing joint development of products and other activities. |
Japan Tobacco Inc. | 1,500,000 | 3,131 | Given our business transactions involving acetate tow and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
NAGASE & CO., LTD. | 1,197,000 | 2,179 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd. | 271,100 | 1,995 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 1,963,580 | 1,492 | We have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company to ensure stable financial and settlement operations for the Daicel Group. |
Denka Company Limited | 322,600 | 1,096 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd. | 369,700 | 749 | Given our business transactions involving automobile airbag inflators and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 145,520 | 568 | We have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company to ensure stable financial and settlement operations for the Daicel Group. |
Communication with Shareholders and Investors
Appropriate Information Disclosure and Constructive Dialogue
Daicel encourages fair evaluation of its corporate value by following its disclosure policy to foster accurate understanding of the Company among its stakeholders, including shareholders and investors. With the aim of building relationships of trust with all its stakeholders, Daicel has disclosed corporate information in a timely, impartial, accurate, and proactive manner on an ongoing basis. We also carry out IR activities to engage in dialogue with our shareholders and investors to further enhance our corporate value.
Our disclosure policy, including our basic policy on information disclosure
General Meeting of Shareholder
We have considered the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders as a valuable opportunity to engage with our shareholders. Daicel posts the convocation notice for its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on its website prior to distributing it by postal mail, aiming to provide shareholders with sufficient time to examine the agenda items. Moreover, to ensure that as many shareholders as possible to exercise their voting rights, we offer voting alternatives via postal mail or the Internet, using computers, smartphones and other devices, for those who are unable to attend the meeting.
To facilitate their further understanding of initiatives of the Daicel Group, we are striving to provide easy-to-understand answers to questions voiced by shareholders.
The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders was held on June 22, 2022, amid the COVID-19 pandemic. During the meeting, we asked shareholders to wear masks and placed alcohol-based disinfectants near the reception desk and contactless thermometers near the entrance as measures to prevent infection. Inside the buildings, we let shareholders seat at a greater distance from each other compared to past meetings, and staff disinfected the microphones after use by each shareholder. Daicel’s Directors and organizing staff also checked their temperatures and physical condition prior to participating and wore masks during the meetings.
We will continue to place importance on dialogue with shareholders and hold General Meetings of Shareholders with thorough safety considerations.
IR Activities
Under the supervision of the officer in charge of IR, the Company promotes IR activities in cooperation with the management team including the president and CEO, and related departments such as the IR department. In line with the forementioned basic policy on Information disclosure, Daicel adopts a proactive approach toward its IR activities.
By holding quarterly financial briefing session and things such as individual interviews, interviews at conferences sponsored by securities companies, and small meetings with the president, the Company strives to promote communication, aspiring to foster better understanding of the Daicel Group among institutional investors. In FY2023/3, business briefings on the Healthcare, Smart and Materials were held as opportunities to promote a better understanding of the Daicel Group's businesses. In view of the COVID-19 pandemic, these IR events, including the financial briefing session, were held not only in person but also online teleconferencing to allow investors to participate as much as possible.
With respect to individual investors, we participated in individual investor events hosted by securities companies and explained our business, in addition to providing information via our corporate website. Furthermore, we conducted an online survey of 2,000 individual investors to develop a deeper understanding of the Daicel Group and ask their opinion about Daicel Group.
Furthermore, we offer an email newsletter service providing information that Daicel has published on TDnet and EDINET. Please follow this link to sign up for our investor relations email newsletter.
FY2023/3 Activities
Scroll left or right
Activity | Frequency | Outline |
---|---|---|
Financial briefing sessions for analysts and institutional investors | 4 | Held on a quarterly basis; the second and fourth quarter briefings were held in parallel with face-to-face meetings and online conferences hosted by the president and CEO, while the first and third quarter briefings were conference calls hosted by the Investor Relations Department. |
Strategy briefings for analysts and institutional investors | 3 | Held briefings (online) as follows:
|
Individual interviews with analysts and institutional investors | Approx. 120 interviews | Conducted online conferences and teleconferences with analysts and institutional investors. (Interviewer or interviewee of the Company: The IR department centered on the head of the IR department, or the officer in charge of IR) |
Small meetings with domestic institutional investors | 1 | Held an online meeting with domestic institutional investors by the president and CEO. |
Participation in conferences for overseas investors | 1 | Participated in a conference in Japan for overseas investors held by securities companies and the officer in charge of IR had face to face dialogues with investors. |
Business briefings for individual investors | 2 | Participated in events for individual investors held by securities companies, and the head of the IR department gave a business explanation (once at the venue, once on video streaming.) |
Feedback on dialogue with shareholders and investors
The IR department feeds back to management and related departments as needed about the content of dialogues with shareholders and investors, their opinions and requests, and the content of analyst reports. In addition, the officer in charge of IR reports the dialogue to the Board of Directors and the IR department reports it to the management team on a quarterly basis at the meetings, which is used in discussions aimed at improving our corporate value.