Basic Approach
Based on our Basic Philosophy of being a “company making lives better by co-creating value,” we see the reinforcement of corporate governance as a key management priority for improving corporate value and thereby contributing to the interests of our various stakeholders. Along with maintaining an efficient and dynamic organizational structure that enables us to quickly respond to changes in our business environment, we strive to preserve and reinforce the already highly effective corporate governance structure through which we consistently improve our corporate value by ensuring managerial transparency and legal compliance.
History of Strengthening Corporate Governance
| Date | Initiative | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| June 1999 | Introduced the Executive Officer System | To separate supervisory and business execution functions clearly |
| June 2000 | Appointed Outside Directors | To strengthen decision-making and supervisory functions and ensure transparency in management |
| Established the Nomination and Compensation Committee | To improve objectivity and transparency in the nomination and compensation assessment process | |
| June 2003 | Shortened the term of office for Directors from two years to one year | To clarify management responsibilities of Directors to shareholders and build a system that responds quickly to changes |
| March 2006 | Established the Information Disclosure Committee | To ensure the reliability of the information to be disclosed |
| April 2006 | Established the Risk Management Committee | To accurately understand and appropriately manage risks |
| May 2006 | Established the Basic Policy for Structuring Internal Control Systems* | To develop an internal control structure |
| August 2010 | Established the Internal Control Council | To build an internal control system and ensure the adequateness of its operation |
| January 2016 | Started to evaluate the effectiveness of the Board of Directors | To maintain and improve the effectiveness of the Board of Directors |
| June 2017 | Increased the ratio of Outside Directors to 50% | To ensure further transparency of decision-making and supervisory functions and management |
| January 2020 | Improved the method for evaluating the effectiveness of the Board of Directors | To introduce individual interviews in addition to surveys |
| June 2022 | Increased the ratio of Outside Directors to 60% | To ensure further transparency of decision-making and supervisory functions and management |
| January 2023 | Changed the method for evaluating the effectiveness of the Board of Directors | To use external experts as part of the evaluation process |
| June 2026 | Introduced Compensation Related to the Performance-Based Stock Compensation Plan | To align Directors compensation with the achievement of mid- to long-term business performance and non-financial targets, we have implemented a system that further connects Directors’ compensation to business outcomes. |
-
* The Basic Policy for Structuring the Internal Control System, established in March 2006, is revised as necessary, such as when organizational changes occur.
Corporate Governance Framework
Outline of the Corporate Governance Framework (As of June 19, 2026)
Electing multiple Outside Directors is a basic policy of the Daicel Group. By electing Outside Directors, who now comprise a majority of the Board of Directors, and considering their opinions and advice as informed by their diverse expertise, Daicel is working to bolster the oversight functions and appropriateness of management decisions made by the Board of Directors. Moreover, our Executive Officer system has enabled us to clearly separate our decision-making/supervisory functions from our business execution functions, allowing for a dynamic business execution structure that allows us to quickly respond to changes in the management environment.
Through this governance structure, we strive to consistently improve corporate value with all reasonable considerations made for our stakeholders.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Type of organizational structure | Company with Audit & Supervisory Board |
| Chairperson of Board of Directors | Chairperson of the Board |
| Number of Directors | 11 (including 2 female Directors) |
| Number of Outside Directors | 6 (including 5 independent Directors) |
| Number of Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 5 (including 1 female Audit & Supervisory Board Member) |
| Number of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 3 (all 3 are independent Audit & Supervisory Board Members) |
| Number of Executive Officers | 21 (including 4 officers concurrently serving as Directors) |
| Number of Board of Director meetings held in FY2026/3 (average attendance rate of outside Directors/outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members) |
15 (98.8%/97.8%) |
| Number of Audit & Supervisory Board meetings held in FY2026/3 (average attendance rate of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members) |
15 (97.8%) |
| Term of office for Directors | 1 year |
| Term of office for Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 4 years |
| Average term in office for Directors | 4.5 years |
| Average term in office for Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 2.6 years |
| Voluntary advisory body to the Board of Directors | The Nomination and Compensation Committee is composed of 9 Directors (including 6 Outside Directors) and chaired by an Outside Director. Meetings held in FY2026/3: 9 |
| Compensation system for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members* |
|
| External Auditor | Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LLC |
-
* The compensation system is also used for Executive Officers and others.
* The ratio of above (1): monthly compensation, (2): performance-linked remuneration, and (3) and (4) collectively: stock compensation is generally 50:30:20, with the ratio changing based on the individual’s position.
Corporate Governance Framework (As of June 19, 2026)
Board of Directors
The Company recognizes the role of the Board of Directors as follows: setting the direction we should aim for, creating a concrete business strategy toward the target, and supervising the execution of business and business operations from an objective point of view. The Board is made up of five Inside Directors and six Outside Directors (nine men and two women) to ensure the effectiveness of this role. Inside Directors have profound insights into our businesses, while Outside Directors have a wealth of experience in business management and diverse expertise. Of the six Outside Directors, five satisfy the “Standards for Independence of Outside Directors/Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members” as defined by the Company. Therefore, we organize the Board of Directors in a way that allows the Outside Directors, who are in a majority on the Board of Directors, to state their opinions to the Company’s management from an objective Directors’ point of view.
The Board of Directors is, in principle, held once a month to make decisions on important management matters and to supervise the execution of duties and business operations. In addition to the Directors, all five Audit & Supervisory Board Members, including three Outside Members, attend the meetings and provide opinions as necessary. The position of Chairperson of the Board of Directors is held by the Chairperson of the Board.
The term of office for Daicel’s Directors is one year. This short term of office enables Daicel shareholders to increase their involvement in the appointment of Directors. At the same time, it allows the Company to better clarify the management responsibilities of its Directors and thereby strengthen its corporate governance.
It is necessary for each Director to develop his/her knowledge of our business to ensure effective supervision of the execution of business. Therefore, we provide opportunities for mainly Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members to tour our manufacturing sites and provide an explanation of Daicel’s departments, products and technologies as well as the Board of Directors’ meetings.
The activities of the Board of Directors are as follows.
Number of Board of Directors meetings in FY2026/3: 15
The number of resolutions, discussions, and reports at Board of Directors meeting was as follows.
| Agenda Category | Number |
|---|---|
| Governance | 25 |
| Compliance, Corporate Ethics | 3 |
| Sustainability | 5 |
| Audit & Supervisory Board Members, External Auditors | 3 |
| Management Strategies | 15 |
| Accounting, Finance | 39 |
| Individual Cases | 7 |
| HR, Remuneration | 37 |
| Internal Audits | 2 |
| Internal Controls | 5 |
| Total | 141 |
FY2026/3 Board of Directors Summary of Major Resolutions, Discussions, and Reports Related to Governance and Compliance
| Date | Agenda Category | Agenda | Summary of Resolutions, Discussions, and Reports |
|---|---|---|---|
| April 25, 2025 | Governance | Report the status of the initiative to the Risk Management Committee | Report the status of risk management activities in FY2025/3 |
| April 25, 2025 | Director and Audit & Supervisory Board Member training track record | Information provision and status of training for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members | |
| April 25, 2025 | Effectiveness evaluation of the Board of Directors | Reporting and discussion of the results of the effectiveness evaluation of the Board of Directors | |
| April 25, 2025 | Guidelines for preparing Board of Directors meeting materials | Discussion on draft guidelines for preparing Board of Directors meeting materials | |
| June 20, 2025 | Corporate Governance Code | Status of response to the Corporate Governance Code | |
| July 17, 2025 | Cross-shareholdings | Consideration of the holding status of Daicel’s cross-held shares | |
| August 1, 2025 | Status of Group whistleblower system | Reporting on the content and response status of internal whistleblowing within the Group | |
| November 6, 2025 | |||
| February 5, 2026 | |||
| February 5, 2026 | Report the status of the initiative to the Risk Management Committee | Interim report on the status of risk management activities in FY2026/3 | |
| April 25, 2025 | Compliance, Corporate Ethics | Report the status of corporate compliance program activities | Report the status of corporate compliance program activities in FY2026/3 |
| June 5, 2025 | Reports and reviews regarding occupational safety | Reporting and reviewing occupational safety at the Company's plant | |
| October 16, 2025 | |||
| May 13, 2025 | Audit & Supervisory Board Members, External Auditors | Audit by Audit & Supervisory Board Members | Reporting on resolutions of the Audit & Supervisory Board, audit plans, audit reports, etc. |
| June 20, 2025 | |||
| July 17, 2025 | |||
| April 25, 2025 | Internal Audits | Internal audits plans | FY2026/3 Internal audits plans |
| June 5, 2025 | Internal control over financial reporting | Reporting and discussion of internal control reports related to financial reporting | |
| April 25, 2025 | Internal Controls | Regarding Basic Policy for Structuring Internal Control Systems | The status of implementation of the Basic Policy for Structuring Internal Control Systems and discussions regarding the revision of the policy |
| February 5, 2026 | |||
| February 20, 2026 | |||
| March 26, 2026 | |||
| February 20, 2026 | Revision of the Emergency Risk Management Guidelines | Regarding the regulations that stipulate responses when risks occur, improvements were made to the content, and the name was revised to “Guidelines for Response to Materialized Risks" |
Audit & Supervisory Board
The Audit & Supervisory Board comprises five members (four men and one woman), and a majority, three members, are independent Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members that meet the standards for independence of Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members. Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members possess extensive experience in accounting, legal affairs, and other disciplines, as well as broad insight into fields such as corporate governance, business ethics, and sustainability management and fulfill auditing functions from a third-party, independent standpoint.
The Audit & Supervisory Board holds meetings to share information, deliberate on, and make decisions about important issues related to the Company’s audits. It also regularly attends Board of Directors meetings and important internal meetings held by Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Members and regularly meets with the Representative Director, Outside Directors, and External Auditors. In addition, it works to improve auditing effectiveness through such means as communicating with the Internal Audit Department’s Auditing Division, etc. when needed.
The activities of the Audit & Supervisory Board Members are as follows.
| Category | Activity | Relevance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full-time | Outside | ||
| (1) Director | Attendance at Board of Directors meetings | ||
| Regular meetings with the Representative Director (exchange of opinions, etc.: held semiannually) | |||
| Regular meetings with Outside Directors (exchange of opinions, etc.: held semiannually) | |||
| (2) Job execution | Interviews and hearings with the President and CEO, Senior Managing Executive Officer, and Managing Executive Officers (implemented for 9 of 9 planned people) |
||
| Attendance at important meetings, such as Management Meetings, Planning Meetings, Management Strategy Meetings and the Internal Control Council | |||
| Perusal and confirmation of important documents (Board of Directors meeting minutes, approval requests, approval documents, etc.) | |||
| Audits of each Company department (implemented for 22 of 22 planned departments) | |||
| Visits to each business site (implemented for 7 of 7 planned sites) | |||
| (3) Subsidiaries | Visits to domestic and overseas Group companies (planned for 26 companies and implemented for 26 companies) | ||
| Regular meetings with Audit & Supervisory Board members of Group companies (reports on the status of each company's audits, exchanges of opinions, etc.: held annually) | |||
| (4) Internal audits | Regular meetings with the Internal Audit Department (explanation of the plan, report on the implementation status, exchange of opinions, etc.)
|
||
| (5) Accounting audits | Regular meetings with the External Auditor (explanation of audit plan, mid-term review reports, audit results reports) | ||
| Meetings with the External Auditor (in addition to the above, status report on non-assurance services, exchanges of opinions, consultations, etc.: held as necessary) | |||
| External Auditor evaluation (held annually) | |||
-
* Relevance [ ○: Responsible ●: Optional / Partially responsible ]
With respect to Key Audit Matters (KAM), along with attending regular meetings and gatherings with External Auditors to confirm brainstorming progress, the Audit & Supervisory Board communicate important information to the executive team as needed.
Nomination and Compensation Committee
The Nomination and Compensation Committee, which is chaired by an Outside Director and consists of Outside Directors, who are the majority of the Board of Directors, the Chairperson of the Board, and Representative Directors, reports on the personnel and remuneration of Directors, Executive Officers and other officers, in response to requests from the Chairperson of the Board of Directors or the Chairperson of the Audit & Supervisory Board, from the point of view of ensuring objectivity, transparency, and validity in the process of making decision.
The Nomination and Compensation Committee is administered in line with the regulations for the Nomination and Compensation Committee. This committee has the authority to state its opinions in response to requests from the Chairperson of the Board of Directors regarding decisions on candidates for Directors and the Audit & Supervisory Board Members, the appointment of Executive Officers, etc. and the compensation assessment process of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members. The Chairperson of the Board of Directors must report the response of the Nomination and Compensation Committee in the Board of Directors meetings regarding decisions on candidates for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members and the decisions on compensation for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members. The Board of Directors meets to make decisions concerning these topics in consideration of responses from the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
The activities of the Nomination and Compensation Committee are as follows.
The number of meetings of the Nomination and Compensation Committee in FY2026/3: 9
The number of Committee agenda items are as follows.
| Agenda Category | Number |
|---|---|
| Individual Cases | 1 |
| Appointment of Executive Officers, etc. | 13 |
| Compensation for Executive Officers, etc. | 2 |
| Appointment of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 6 |
| Compensation for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members | 11 |
| Total | 33 |
Executive Officers
The Company has an Executive Officer System in order to clearly delineate decision-making and supervisory functions from business execution functions and further energize corporate management through swift decision-making.
The Company’s 21 Executive Officers (four of whom are also Directors) execute operations as heads of SBUs, sites, or corporate divisions or as Presidents of Group companies.
In accordance with the Rules Concerning Circulars (rules relating to job functions) these Executive Officers are given a certain measure of decision-making authority that they exercise to make swift decisions after accurately assessing business opportunities. Certain committees have an Executive Officer nominated by the President and CEO to serve as Chairperson in overseeing efforts to develop driven, responsible managers that will achieve the aims of the medium-term strategy and long-term vision of the Company.
These Executive Officers report important matters concerning business execution at monthly Board of Directors meetings and take advice from Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members to serve in supervising the Board of Directors.
Management Meetings
In the course of the President and CEO carrying out basic policies on corporate management as determined by the Board of Directors, the Management Meetings holds discussions and makes decisions about important business plans and business execution plans, as well as individual business operation execution.
Generally meeting twice a month, the committee consists of the President and CEO as well as Directors (excluding Outside Directors) and Executive Officers nominated by the President and CEO. The committee also has two Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member who give their views on matters when needed.
The committee reports on the progress and results of its proceedings at monthly Board of Directors meetings and takes advice from Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members to serve in supervising the Board of Directors.
Composition of Each Body and Status of Director Activities (As of June 19, 2026)
| Name | Position | Term in Office | Independent Director | Execution of Operations | Board of Directors (FY2024/3 Attendance) | Audit & Supervisory Board (FY2024/3 Attendance) | Nomination and Compensation Committee (FY2024/3 Attendance) | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoshimi Ogawa | Chairperson of the Board | 15 years |
(100%) |
(100%) |
Chairperson of Board of Directors | |||
| Yasuhiro Sakaki | President and CEO | 6 years | (100%) |
(100%) |
||||
| Kotaro Sugimoto | Representative Director | 7 years | (100%) |
(100%) |
||||
| Toshio Shiwaku | Director | 2 years | (100%) |
|||||
| Naotaka Kawaguchi | Director | 2 years | (100%) |
|||||
| Toshio Asano | Outside Director | 7 years | (100%) |
(100%) |
Chairperson of the Nomination and Compensation Committee | |||
| Yuriya Komatsu | Outside Director | 4 years | (100%) |
(100%) |
||||
| Mari Okajima | Outside Director | 3 years | (100%) |
(100%) |
||||
| Keita Nishiyama | Outside Director | 3 years | (100%) |
(88%) |
||||
| Seiji Kito | Outside Director | 1 year | (91%) |
(100%) |
||||
| Sayu Ueno (New appointment) |
Outside Director | - | (-) |
(-) |
||||
| Mikio Yagi | Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 3 years | (100%) |
(100%) |
Chairperson of the Audit & Supervisory Board | |||
| Shinji Tatsukawa (New appointment) |
Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | - | (-) |
(-) |
||||
| Hideo Makuta | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 6 years | (100%) |
(100%) |
||||
| Hisae Kitayama | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | 4 years | (100%) |
(100%) |
||||
| Koji Hasegawa (New appointment) |
Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | - | (-) |
(-) |
-
* Attendance rate is for FY2026/3.
- Directors & Senior Management
- Standards for Independence of Outside Directors / Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members[PDF: 22KB]
Effectiveness Evaluation of the Board of Directors
Every year, Daicel conducts and publicly releases a summary of an effectiveness evaluation of the Board of Directors, which aims to maintain and improve the Board’s performance and find the most suitable approach to corporate governance.
FY2026/3 Initiatives Based on the FY2025/3 Effectiveness Evaluation
Based on the FY2025/3 effectiveness evaluation, we pursued various initiatives in FY2026/3 to help further enhance the quality of discussion in the Board of Directors. These initiatives included allocating time for the discussion of reports on the implementation of management strategies, progress on sustainability, and human-capital-related initiatives, and also a review of the ideal form of board materials to facilitate effective discussion. Furthermore, in FY2026/3, we also focused on discussions regarding the formulation of a new mid-term management strategy.
Summary of the Evaluation Process and Results
| Evaluation process | Questionnaires were distributed to all Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members, and individual interviews were conducted based on their responses to further investigate the issues. These results were then compiled and analyzed by the Secretariat and reported to and discussed by the Board of Directors. |
|---|---|
| Main evaluation items |
|
| Overview of evaluation results | Members of the Board of Directors engaged in productive discussions with Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members who actively offered their opinions, and we were able to confirm that the effectiveness of the Board is generally satisfactory.
On the other hand, it was confirmed that there are issues to be discussed for further improvement of its effectiveness. The main issues raised were as follows:
|
| Actions to be taken | We will discuss the above issues at the Board of Directors meeting for FY2027/3 and confirm our commitment to continue addressing them in order to further enhance effectiveness. |
Internal Audit
Daicel has established an Auditing Division, Corporate Compliance Program, and Safety and Quality Auditing Division as internal audit units and works to enhance the effectiveness of audits while communicating with Audit & Supervisory Board Members as appropriate.
| Auditing Division | The Auditing Division, in cooperation with the internal audit organization of the Daicel Group, conducts annual audits of each site, including Group companies. In addition, based on the results of audits, it supports the appropriate business activities of the audited organization by proposing improvements to problems. It regularly reports audit results to the Board of Directors and the Audit & Supervisory Board |
|---|---|
| Corporate Compliance Program | Corporate Compliance |
| Safety and Quality Auditing Division, Assessment Headquarters |
The Safety and Quality Auditing Division conducts annual audits on safety,*quality, and the environment at each site, including Group companies. The results of audits are not only fed back to the audited organizations but are also shared across the entire Group to promote improvements. It regularly reports audit results to the Management Meetings and the Audit & Supervisory Board.
|
Appointment and Compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
Appointment and Nomination Procedures for Directors and Senior Management
In nominating and appointing Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members, and management executives such as Executive Officers, the Daicel seeks individuals with the right personality, knowledge, motivation, ethical stance and management perspectives for leading the Company and who meet the basic criteria of supporting and upholding the Daicel Group’s Basic Philosophy, Sustainable Management Policy, the Daicel Group Code of Conduct, and the Ethical Standards of Daicel Group, and who possess the necessary credentials and experience for enhancing Daicel’s medium- and long-term corporate value. The Board of Directors decides on nominations and appointments based on the advice of the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
Daicel has declared its support for the Challenge Initiatives for 30% of executives* to be women by 2030 (#Here We Go 203030), sponsored by Keidanren. Daicel has positioned Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DE&I) as a key materiality. The Company will seek to further enhance our corporate value by combining the power of diverse human resources, including women.
-
* Executives include senior managers, such as Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members, and Executive Officers.
Reasons for Appointment and Status of Activities of Outside Directors and Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members
Daicel appoints its Outside Directors in accordance with its own Standards for Independence of Outside Directors/Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members, which, in principle, require that Outside Directors be sufficiently independent and present no risk of conflicts of interest with general shareholders. Daicel also designates all Outside Directors who satisfy the independence criteria as independent Directors.
Reasons for Appointment of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members (As of June 19, 2025)
| Director | Position | Reason for Appointment |
|---|---|---|
| Yoshimi Ogawa | Chairperson of the Board | Through a long career centered on the Production Technology and Responsible Care divisions, Mr. Ogawa has a proven track record of innovation in the operation of our production bases and served as our President and CEO for approximately six years from June 2019, strongly leading the entire Daicel Group with a focus on enhancing corporate value. Based on these achievements and extensive experience, knowledge, and insights in all aspects of our management, we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management. |
| Yasuhiro Sakaki | President and CEO | Through a long career in Daicel's Safety segment, as President of an overseas subsidiaries, and in the departments involved in promoting corporate strategy, Mr. Sakaki has played a central role in our management both domestically and internationally. Furthermore, since becoming a Director, he has been responsible for numerous segments such as Material, Smart, and Life Sciences, in addition to formulating and promoting our mid-term strategy, and has worked diligently to expand their business scope. Based on these achievements and extensive experience, knowledge, and insights in all aspects of our management, we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management. |
| Kotaro Sugimoto | Representative Director | Through a long career mainly in our financial and accounting, compliance, and other management divisions, and at the Raw Material Purchasing Center, Mr. Sugimoto has dedicated his efforts to strengthening our corporate governance system, which forms the foundation of our management. Furthermore, since becoming a Director, he has played a central role in formulating the personnel system, promoting DE&I initiatives, and driving sustainable management and digital strategies. Based on these achievements and extensive experience, knowledge, and insights in all aspects of our management, we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management. |
| Toshio Shiwaku | Director |
Based on a long career at Polyplastics Co., Ltd.,* a major subsidiary, primarily in research and development, management strategy, and new business development, Mr. Shiwaku contributed to the global expansion of the Company as its Representative Director and President. Furthermore, since becoming an Executive Officer of our Company, he has utilized his extensive experience, knowledge, and insights on the Daicel Group company management and overseas business, contributing to strengthening research and development, safety, quality, and compliance within the Group as the General Manager of the Assessment Headquarters and General Manager of the R&D Headquarters, among other roles. Based on these achievements, we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management.
|
| Naotaka Kawaguchi | Director | Through a long career centered on the production technology division, Safety segment, and production division, and as the President of an overseas subsidiary, Mr. Kawaguchi has diligently worked on formulating and implementing measures to improve our production technology and resolve challenges. Furthermore, since becoming an Executive Officer, he has played a central role in improving productivity and exploring technological innovation at our production bases while also broadly serving as the head of an overseas subsidiary. Based on these achievements and extensive experience, knowledge, and insights in all aspects of our management and production technology we determined he is suitable to promote our Group and global business management. |
| Toshio Asano | Outside Director | Mr. Asano possesses extensive knowledge and experience as a manager cultivated in the management of chemical product manufacturing and sales companies, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Yuriya Komatsu | Outside Director | Ms. Komatsu possesses extensive knowledge and experience as a manager cultivated in the management of Japanese and international investment companies and information and communications companies, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Mari Okajima | Outside Director | Ms. Okajima possesses highly specialized knowledge and broad insights as an academic researcher conducting various studies related to customer satisfaction, SDGs, and other social issues, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Keita Nishiyama | Outside Director | Mr. Nishiyama possesses deep knowledge of economic and industrial policy and IT policy cultivated through work in the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, as well as extensive knowledge as a manager cultivated in power companies and investment companies, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Seiji Kito | Outside Director | Mr. Kitayama possesses extensive knowledge and experience as a manager cultivated in the management of financial institutions, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Sayu Ueno | Outside Director | Mr. Sayu Ueno has been involved in formulating management strategies at a major general trading company, as well as in developing global sales strategies and promoting sales activities for chemical products, which are one of the Company’s principal businesses, with due consideration for sustainability. In addition, he has management experience as an Executive Officer of the said company and possesses extensive business experience and a professional network in the United States, one of the Company’s key markets. Based on these qualifications, the Company has determined that he is an appropriate person to serve as an Outside Director of the Company, and we wish to leverage these qualities in our management. |
| Audit & Supervisory Board Members | Position | Reason for Appointment |
|---|---|---|
| Mikio Yagi | Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Yagi has served as the President and CEO of a Group company as well as the responsible person for the Safety segment, etc. Given his insights from his extensive experience and special expertise in the fields related to production, sales, product quality, etc. of Daicel, we determined that he is qualified to serve as an Audit & Supervisory Member responsible for implementing audits based on a neutral and objective perspective to ensure sound management at Daicel. |
| Shinji Tatsukawa | Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Shinji Tatsukawa had served as the President of one of the group companies as well as the person responsible for the Company’s production bases. Based on his insights driven by his extensive experience in production activities related to resin products, the Company’s founding business, the Company has determined that he is an appropriate person as an Audit & Supervisory Board Member to perform audits from a neutral and objective point of view and be responsible for securing the soundness of management. |
| Hideo Makuta | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Makuta possesses highly specialized knowledge and extensive insights as an attorney at law and has served as a prosecutor at the Supreme Prosecutors Office, a member of the Fair Trade Commission, and an outside officer of companies. Given this track record, we have determined that he is qualified for the post of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member. |
| Hisae Kitayama | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Ms. Kitayama possesses highly specialized knowledge and extensive insights as a certified public accountant and has served as a partner at a major auditing firm and an executive for an association of certified public accountants. She also has experience with corporate affairs as an Outside Director. For these and other reasons, we have determined that she is qualified for the post of Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member. |
| Koji Hasegawa | Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member | Mr. Koji Hasegawa has experience in corporate management at an information-systems-related company and also has advanced specialized knowledge and wide insights as an academic who conducts various areas of studies primarily relating to corporate governance, business administration, sustainability management, and risk management. The Company has determined that he is an appropriate person to be an Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Member. |
-
* All of the Directors and some Audit & Supervisory Board Members were appointed on June 19, 2026. The other Audit & Supervisory Board Members were appointed on the date of the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held in previous fiscal years.
Directors’ and Auditors’ Primary Areas of Knowledge and Experience (Skill Matrix)
| Name | Corporate management | Global management | Marketing /Business planning | Technology/R&D | Finance and accounting | Legal affairs, intellectual property, risk management | DX | Sustainability | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environment | Diversity, Equity & Inclusion | ||||||||||
| Director | Yoshimi Ogawa | ||||||||||
| Yasuhiro Sakaki | |||||||||||
| Kotaro Sugimoto | |||||||||||
| Toshio Shiwaku | |||||||||||
| Naotaka Kawaguchi | |||||||||||
| Toshio Asano | Outside | ||||||||||
| Yuriya Komatsu | Outside | ||||||||||
| Mari Okajima | Outside | ||||||||||
| Keita Nishiyama | Outside | ||||||||||
| Seiji Kito | Outside | ||||||||||
| Sayu Ueno | Outside | ||||||||||
| Audit & Supervisory Board Members | Mikio Yagi | ||||||||||
| Shinji Tatsukawa | |||||||||||
| Hideo Makuta | Outside | ||||||||||
| Hisae Kitayama | Outside | ||||||||||
| Koji Hasegawa | Outside | ||||||||||
-
* Up to five items that are particularly expected of each person are listed. The above matrix does not represent all the knowledge and experience of each person.
Compensation for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members
-
1.Basic Policy
-
(1)The Compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members shall be determined by Board of Directors’ resolutions for Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members’ discussions for Audit & Supervisory Board Members, within the scope of the total amount of compensation, etc. approved at the General Meeting of Shareholders.
-
(2)The Compensation of Directors shall consist of monthly compensation, performance-based bonuses, and stock compensation, which will generally be paid according to a 50:30:20 ratio that is subject to change according to the position. This rule does not apply to Outside Directors, who shall be paid only monthly compensation. The compensation of Audit & Supervisory Board Members shall consist solely of monthly compensation.
-
(3)To ensure objectivity, transparency, and validity regarding compensation, the Board of Directors makes its decisions following deliberations based on recommendations made by the Nomination and Compensation Committee.
-
-
2.Basic Policy on Compensation
-
(1)Monthly Compensation
In principle, the monthly compensation of Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members is a fixed amount paid in accordance with internal rules that are determined by the Directors’ duties and job titles in business execution and whether or not the Audit & Supervisory Board Members are full time.
Regarding monthly compensation, the Company has revised the compensation to an appropriate and fair level, reflective of its business performance, accomplishment of medium- and long-term business plans, and social situations, among other factors. -
(2)Performance-linked Remuneration
Performance-linked remuneration of Directors is paid in accordance with the accomplishment of performance indicators designated by the Board of Directors. Currently, net sales, EBITDA, and ROIC are used. The basic amount of the performance-based bonus is calculated by multiplying the rank-based amount with a payment rate that fluctuates between 0% and 200%, depending on the level of accomplishment of the performance indicators. The payout rates linked to the weight and achievement rate of each indicator are calculated as shown in the table below.Indicator Weight Target achievement rate Coefficient Consolidated net sales 40% 120% or more 200% More than 100% but less than 120% *1 100% 100% More than 80% but less than 100% *2 80% or less 0% EBITDA 40% 120% or more 200% More than 100% but less than 120% *1 100% 100% More than 80% but less than 100% *2 80% or less 0% ROIC 20% 120% or more 200% More than 100% but less than 120% *1 100% 100% More than 80% but less than 100% *2 80% or less 0% -
*1These bonuses are proportional to the percentage that the target figure was achieved, within a range of 101% to 199%.
-
*2These bonuses are proportional to the percentage that the target figure was achieved, within a range of 1% to 99%.
The final amounts of performance-based bonuses are determined by assessing the status of each Director from the perspectives of practicing Sustainable Management Policy and accomplishing Mid-Term Management Strategy and adding or subtracting up to 20% to or from the basic amounts of the performance-based bonuses.
-
-
(3)Stock Compensation
To step up value sharing with shareholders and motivate Directors to contribute more to medium- to long-term improvement in corporate value, Daicel introduced the Restricted Stock Compensation System and Performance-Based Stock Compensation Plan (Performance Share Unit Plan). Regarding Restricted Stock Compensation System, the stocks cannot be transferred for a period of 30 years, and the Board of Directors decides on an amount for each eligible individual, which is then divided by the stock price at a certain point to calculate the number of shares to be awarded. Regarding Performance-Based Stock Compensation Plan, the Board of Directors decides on an amount for each eligible individual, which is then divided by the stock price at a certain point to determine the number of Performance Share Units granted to each individual. These units represent the right to receive shares, and the final number of shares to be delivered is determined based on the achievement level of each indicator (net sales, EBITDA, ROIC, reduction of GHG emissions, and occupational safety, all on a consolidated basis for the Daicel Group) set forth in the Company’s mid-term management plan. Upon confirmation of achievement, the corresponding number of shares is delivered to the individual. In addition, the stocks granted as Performance-Based Stock Compensation are subject to the same transfer restriction period as Restricted Stock Compensation System.
-
-
* The executive compensation system is current as of July 1, 2026. Daicel does not have a system for paying retirement benefits to officers.
FY2026/3 Total Compensation
| Category | Number of Recipients | Amount (Annual) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash Compensation | Stock-based Compensation | Total | |||
| Monthly Compensation | Performance-based Bonus | ||||
| Directors (Outside Directors) |
12 (6) |
357 million yen (87 million yen) |
39 million yen (–) |
65 million yen (–) |
463 million yen (87 million yen) |
| Audit & Supervisory Board Members (Outside Members) |
5 (3) |
88 million yen (43 million yen) |
(–) |
(–) |
88 million yen (43 million yen) |
| Total | 17 | 445百万円 | 39百万円 | 65百万円 | 551百万円 |
-
* With regard to the amount of the Company’s Director monetary compensation, it was approved at the 158th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 21, 2024, to be 640 million yen or less per year (including 140 million yen or less per year for Outside Directors). Additionally, with regard to the amount of compensation for granting restricted stock, which is separate from the amount of compensation above, it was approved at the 152nd Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 22, 2018, to be 100 million yen or less per year to Directors of the Company (excluding Outside Directors). In addition, with regard to the amount of compensation related to the Performance-Based Stock Compensation Plan (Performance Share Unit Plan) for Directors (excluding Outside Directors), it was approved at the 160th Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 19, 2026, to be 610 million yen or less for each consecutive five fiscal years.
-
* A resolution of the 158th Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 21, 2024, held the amount of compensation for Audit & Supervisory Board Members to a maximum of 130 million yen annually.
Return of Stock Compensation
For the purpose of ensuring the soundness of the stock compensation system for Directors, under the Restricted Stock Compensation System, the Company has established a provision to confiscate all or part of the stock-compensation before or after the lifting of the transfer restriction at the discretion of the Board of Directors in the event of a certain reason such as an unlawful act.
Also, under the Performance-based Stock Compensation Plan, the eligible recipients are not granted the right to receive shares at the discretion of the Board of Directors in the event of a certain reason such as an unlawful act before the vesting date.
Training for Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members and Executive Officers
Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board Members attend external seminars and training sessions in order to accomplish such things as acquiring the knowledge necessary for the performance of their duties and work tasks, as well as to update their skills. The Company bears the costs of these activities.
It also provides annual compliance training for Directors, Audit & Supervisory Board Members, Executive Officers, and other employees such as senior employees (excluding Outside Directors).
In addition, we provide opportunities for Outside Directors to tour our manufacturing sites and receive an explanation of Daicel’s business activities so they can better understand our business and utilize their knowledge in discussions at Board of Directors meetings.
In FY2026/3, we conducted activities such as executive training on corporate ethics, explained the business of the Intellectual Property Center, R&D Headquarters, and Smart SBU, reported on our sustainability activities and shared initiatives to promote the participation of women.
Establishment of the Internal Control System
Daicel develops and manages a system of internal controls under its Basic Policy for Structuring the Internal Control System to ensure the appropriateness of its business operations as stipulated under Japan’s Companies Act.
Furthermore, Daicel has established the Internal Control Council, chaired by a senior managing executive officer, who concurrently serves as the general manager of the Corporate Support Headquarters and comprising general managers of corporate departments as members, to accurately grasp the status of the establishment and management of these systems and to discuss related measures toward ultimately ensuring the effectiveness of internal controls throughout the Group.
Standing Audit & Supervisory Board Members also attend meetings held by the council as observers. The council provides a report on its activities to the Audit & Supervisory Board and Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors has confirmed that the Basic Policy is being implemented appropriately.
Policy Regarding Cross-Holdings of Shares
Policy on Cross-Holdings of Shares
Daicel only adheres to a shareholding policy insofar as it is judged to contribute to the improvement of the medium- and long-term corporate value of the Daicel Group from the perspectives of, for example, strengthening business relationships, maintaining the stability of transactions with financial institutions, and maintaining or strengthening cooperative business relationships.
When any stocks do not meet the purpose of our possession or are not recognized as being economically rational due to changes in the business environment or other factors, we will reduce them accordingly.
We regularly review the purpose and appropriateness of all stocks we hold, as well as the quantitative and qualitative benefits of our business transactions and the economic practicality of the risk of such transactions. The results of these reviews are reported to the Board of Directors, which examines their content.
Cross-Shareholdings of the Company (Investment Shares Held for Purposes Other than to Be Net Assets)
In line with the above-mentioned policy, in FY2026/3 the Company sold all the shares of five securities and some shares of one security out of 14 listed securities held by the Company. As of the end of FY2026/3, the Company held 36 stocks for a balance sheet amount of ¥36.0 billion. Although the rise in share prices has increased the market value of shares, the Company proceeded with the sale of the strategic shareholdings as planned. This resulted in a decrease in the amount recorded on the balance sheet.
| FY2023/3 | FY2024/3 | FY2025/3 | FY2026/3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of brands of stocks (brands) | Unlisted stocks | 26 | 27 | 26 | 27 |
| Listed stocks | 22 | 20 | 14 | 9 | |
| Total | 48 | 47 | 40 | 36 | |
| Amount reported in the balance sheet (billions of yen) |
Unlisted stocks | 13 | 19 | 10 | 10 |
| Listed stocks | 576 | 692 | 449 | 350 | |
| Total | 589 | 712 | 459 | 360 | |
| Ratio of consolidated net assets (%) | 19.0 | 19.0 | 12.2 | 9.7 | |
Cross-Shareholdings (As of March 31, 2026)
| Stock | Number of Shares Owned | Amount Reported in Balance Sheet at Fiscal Year-end (Unit: Millions of Yen) |
Purpose of Shareholding |
|---|---|---|---|
| FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation | 7,293,747 | 21,636 | Given our business transactions involving cellulose acetate and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd | 813,300 | 5,995 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD. | 156,000 | 2,914 | We have continuously held the shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company in pursuing joint development of products and other activities. |
| Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 327,660 | 1,640 | We have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company to ensure stable financial and settlement operations for the Daicel Group. |
| Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd. | 369,700 | 1,481 | Given our business transactions involving automobile airbag inflators and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Osaka Soda Co., Ltd. | 324,000 | 553 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Nihon Plast Co., Ltd. | 1,000,000 | 415 | Given our business transactions involving inflators for automobile airbags and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. | 111,120 | 399 | Given our business transactions involving organic chemicals and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
| MARUTO SANGYO CO., LTD. | 4,700 | 10 | Given our business transactions involving packaging films and other products, we have continuously held these shares to maintain and strengthen our favorable relationship with the company. |
Cross-Shareholdings of the Company (Total Investment Securities and Deemed Holdings of Shares for Purposes Other than to Be Net Assets)
| FY2023/3 | FY2024/3 | FY2025/3 | FY2026/3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total amount of cross-shareholdings (billions of yen) | 730 | 925 | 638 | 547 |
| Ratio of consolidated net assets (%) | 23.5 | 24.7 | 17.0 | 14.8 |
Plan for Future Stockholding Reductions
In light of various circumstances that include the impact on the market and the financial strategies of the issuing entity, the Company plans to sell any stock that fails to satisfy our purpose for shareholding or that is deemed to be no longer economically practical due to factors that include changes in the business environment.
The balance of cross-shareholdings not including deemed holdings of shares and cross-shareholdings including deemed holdings of shares as a proportion of consolidated net assets in the next Mid-Term Management Strategy is expected to be as shown below.
| FY2027/3 | FY2028/3 | FY2029/3 | FY2030/3 | FY2031/3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total amount of cross-shareholdings (excluding deemed holdings of shares) (billions of yen) | 351 | 283 | 210 | 160 | 160 |
| Ratio of consolidated net assets (%) | 9.5 | 7.6 | 5.7 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Total amount of cross-shareholdings (including deemed holdings of shares) (billions of yen) | 538 | 470 | 397 | 347 | 347 |
| Ratio of consolidated net assets (%) | 14.5 | 12.7 | 10.7 | 9.4 | 9.4 |
-
* The Company’s reduction plan is based on current information obtained by the Company and on certain assumptions deemed to be reasonable. Actual figures may diverge from the plan due to various factors.
Communication with Shareholders and Investors
Appropriate Information Disclosure and Constructive Dialogue
Daicel encourages fair evaluation of its corporate value by following its Disclosure Policy to foster accurate understanding of the Company among its stakeholders, including shareholders and investors. With the aim of building relationships of trust with all its stakeholders, Daicel has disclosed corporate information in a timely, impartial, accurate, and proactive manner on an ongoing basis. We also carry out IR activities to engage in dialogue with our shareholders and investors to further enhance our corporate value.
General Meeting of Shareholders
We have considered the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders as a valuable opportunity to engage with our shareholders. For this reason, Daicel posts the convocation notice for its Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on its website prior to distributing it by postal mail, aiming to provide shareholders with sufficient time to examine the agenda items. Moreover, to ensure that as many shareholders as possible exercise their voting rights, we offer voting alternatives via postal mail or the Internet, using computers, smartphones and other devices, for those who are unable to attend the meeting.
To facilitate further understanding of the initiatives of the Daicel Group, we are striving to provide easy-to-understand answers to questions voiced by shareholders.
At the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on June 20, 2025, we held the post-meeting reception, allowing for deeper dialogue between shareholders and the Company’s executives.
IR Activities
Under the supervision of the officer in charge of IR, the Company promotes IR activities in cooperation with the management team including the President and CEO, and related departments such as the IR department. In line with the aforementioned Basic Policy on Information Disclosure, Daicel adopts a proactive approach toward its IR activities.
By holding quarterly financial briefing sessions and things such as individual interviews, interviews at conferences sponsored by securities companies, and IR events, the Company strives to promote communication, aspiring to foster better understanding of the Daicel Group among institutional investors. In FY2026/3, we held a tour of the Fujii Plant of Polyplastics Co., Ltd. (currently the Fuji Plant of Daicel Corporation) as an opportunity to promote a better understanding of the Daicel Group's businesses.
We provide information to individual investors through our corporate website and strive to enhance its content so that they can understand the Daicel Group in an easier-to-understand manner. Furthermore, in FY2026/3, we also provided opportunities to deepen understanding of the Daicel Group and receive feedback by distributing a company profile video through a security company website and conducting web surveys targeting individual investors.
Please follow this link to sign up for our investor relations email newsletter.
FY2026/3 Main Activities
| Activity | Frequency | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Financial briefing sessions for analysts and institutional investors | 4 | Held briefings on a quarterly basis (the second and fourth quarter briefings were hosted by the President and CEO, while the first and third quarter briefings were hosted by the Division Manager of the Investor Relations Department) |
| Individual interviews with analysts and institutional investors | 160 (approx.) | Hosted by the Investor Relations Unit centered on the President and CEO, the Officer in charge of IR, and the head of the Investor Relations Unit |
| Event for analysts and institutional investors | 1 | Held a tour of the Fujii Plant of Polyplastics Co., Ltd. (currently the Fuji Plant of Daicel Corporation) |
| Participation in conferences for institutional investors | 5 | The President and CEO, the Officer in charge of IR, and the head of the Investor Relations Unit participated in conferences in Japan held by securities companies for mainly overseas institutional investors |
Feedback on Dialogue with Shareholders and Investors
The IR department informs management and related departments as needed about the content of dialogues with shareholders and investors, their opinions and requests, and the content of analyst reports. In addition, the Officer in charge of IR reports the dialogue to the Board of Directors, and the IR department reports it to the management team on a quarterly basis at the meetings, which is used in discussions aimed at improving our corporate value.